Vol. 7 (05) pp. 1040-1048 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9133

ALTERNATIVE POLICY FOR RESOLVING NATIONAL BORDER PROBLEMS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA AND TIMOR LESTE VIEWED FROM ASPECTS CULTURE.

  • Public Administration Study Program Graduate program Nusa Cendana University, Kupang.
17 Downloads 123 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Relationship and cultural closeness between people two countries politically different,but it blends together culture, customs, traditions, languages and others as one nation family. This is what is seen from the Ambeno community in Timor Leste and Amfoang (NTT) in Indonesia which then conflicts because of the determination of the boundary which has not been resolved by two countries. Actually there is value customary values and very strong culture that binds the people of two countries. Factor that caused the conflict to be triggered by the release and establishment of East Timor as a new country and interests of certain groups who do not want estability on the border.Various theories and alternative approaches namely pen cultural approach used as an analysis knife so it is believed to be able to provide the best solution for settlement dispute over the Naktuka border area. Conflict theory and policy and variety Approach politics, administration and culture has important for three core values local wisdom towards settlement of this case, namely; Nahebiti boots, but bandu and cruzjovem. Qualitative methodology with descriptive nature of analysis with a case and approach policy assessment and collection techniques the data is done by doing it interview and observation. Data testing is done by using data validity qualitative. The results of the study show that by using a cultural approach provide enormous benefits for both n state so the settlement model this border conflict will be a model for the country other countries that have cases the same about border conflict. Value local cultural values or local wisdom that is, Tara bandu, Cruz Jovem and NaheBiti Boot globally and global cultural values acceptable to local culture. Local wisdom will be a model for settlement stopped and conflicts between countries in relations international.

Keywords

How to Cite This Article

Hugo Lourenco da Costa. (2019); ALTERNATIVE POLICY FOR RESOLVING NATIONAL BORDER PROBLEMS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA AND TIMOR LESTE VIEWED FROM ASPECTS CULTURE., International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 7 (05), 1040-1048, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9133

Corresponding Author

Hugo Lourenco da Costa
Public Administration Study Program Graduate program Nusa Cendana University, Kupang.

Article Analytics

References

  1. Abubakar, Mustafa. 2006.MenataPulau-Pulau Kecil Perbatasan: BelajardariKasusSipadan, LigitandanSibatik.
  2. Anderson, Benedict. 1972.Imagined Communities, Reflections on the Origin and Spread ofNationalism. London and New York: Verso.
  3. Budiardjo, Miriam.Dasar-DasarIlmuPolitik. 2003, GramediaPustakaUtama, Jakarta.
  4. Brunet, ImanuelJailly, 2005. Theorizing Borders: An Interdisiplinaryperspective?,
  5. Conn, Paul. Conflict and Decision Making: An Introduction to Political Science. New York:Harper& Row Publisher
  6. Creswell, John W. 2007. Research Design. PendekatanKualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed.
  7. Dahrendorf, Ralf. ?Conflict Groups, Group Conflicts, and Social Change,?
  8. Deeley, Neil. ?International Boundaries of East Timor?, dalam Boundaries and TeritorryBriefing.
  9. Dunn, William N. 2000. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Prentice HallInternational, Englewood, New Jersey.
  10. Dye, R. Thomas, 1976. What Governments, Why They Do It, What Difference It Makes.
  11. Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press.
  12. Hidayat A, Atep. 2011. BadanOtoritaPerbatasan Negara.
  13. Holsty, K.J. 1985. PolitikInternasional: SuatuKerangkaAnalisis
  14. Ikbar, Yanuar. Metodologi&TeoriHubunganInternasional. RefikaAditama, Bandung.
  15. Indihono, Dwiyanto. 2017. KebijakanPublikBerbasis: DYNAMIC POLICY ANALYSIS, GavaMedia, edisi 2 revisi.
  16. Nainggolan, PoltakPartogi. PermasalahanPerbatasan Indonesia dengan Negara-NegaraTetangga Lain: UrgensinyaBagiSebuahPenelitian?. Tim Peneliti.
  17. 1974. SebuahPendekatanuntukMempelajariSistemSosialIndonesia.Jogyakarta: FakultasSospol UGM.
  18. Nor, Firman, 2017. Negara danKedaulatanPolitik: EvaluasiAtasPemeliharaanRasaKebangsaanOleh Negara.
  19. Noveria, Mita&Firman Noor, 2017. Kedaulatan Indonesia Di WilaahPerbatasan. YayasanPustakaObor Indonesia, LIPI.
  20. Pruitt, Dean G. dan Jeffrey Z. Robin, 2004. TeoriKonflikSosial. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.
  21. Rosdiana, H.A. 2015. ManajemanKonflik, Bandung.
  22. Sarwono, Sarlito W. 1999. Jakarta: BulanBintang. Hlm. 145
  23. Surbakti, Ramlan. 2010. ?Konflikdan Proses Politik?. Jakarta.
  24. Soeprapto, (1996: 54) Cita Negara Persatuan Indonesia.
  25. Wila, Marnixon.2006.Konsepsi HukumDalamPengaturandanPengelolaanWilayahPerbatasanAntarnegara.
  26. Wuryandari, Ganewati. 2017. PengelolaanKedaulatan Negara DalamKonteksPertahananDiPerbatasan RI ? Malaysia.
  27. Wuryandari, Ganewatidkk, 2009. Keamanan Di Perbatasan Indonesia ? Timor Leste:SumberAncaman Dan KebijakanPengelolaannya. PustakaPelajar.

Similar Articles