Vol. 7 (05) pp. 410-418 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9053

RELIABILITY AWARE MECHANISM TO ENSURE INCREASED FAULT TOLERANCE USING TEMPERATURE DRIVEN THROTTLE LOAD BALANCER.

and
  • MtechStudent,Department of Computer Science And Technology, Guru NankDev University Amritsar , India.
  • Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science And Technology, Guru NankDev University Amritsar , India.
17 Downloads 67 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Cloud computing provides resources to the machines having limited resources associated with them. Cloud resources although are infinite but still lacks as the users of the cloud increases day by day. Early completion of job assigned to the virtual machine considerably solves the problem of starvation and availability. This paper proposed a mechanism to handle tasks from various sources submitted to the cloud. The mechanism consist of two phases: first phase is used to monitor the virtual machines that lead to selection of optimal VM having sufficient resources and second phase allocate the resources to the tasks. Continues monitoring process using throttle load balancing, also checks the load on individual machine. In case load increases, migration to the next VM is initiated. The parameters considered in the proposed system follow reliability metric. The metric enhancement is the main objective of proposed system. The overall mechanism suggested through the proposed system fall under proactive fault tolerance. The simulation is conducted within Netbeans IDE and cloudsim 4.0 and evaluation parameters are load balancing degree, throughput and execution cost. Performance enhancement by 6% is observed which is significant proving worth of study.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Liu, S. Wang, A. Zhou, S. Kumar, F. Yang, and R. Buyya, ?Using Proactive Fault-Tolerance Approach to Enhance Cloud Service Reliability,? IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput., pp. 1?1, 2016.
  2. Veerapandi and K. Alagarsamy, ?Fault Tolerance Avoidance in Cloud Computing Software Applications,? vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 166?169, 2017.
  3. Nathani, S. Chaudhary, and G. Somani, ?Policy based resource allocation in IaaS cloud,? Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 94?103, 2012.
  4. Buyya, R. Ranjan, and R. N. Calheiros, ?InterCloud : Utility-Oriented Federation of Cloud Computing Environments for Scaling of Application Services,? pp. 1?20.
  5. M. Gonzalez, T. Cristina, M. De Brito, and C. C. Miers, ?Cloud resource management : towards efficient execution of large-scale scientific applications and workflows on complex infrastructures,? IEEE Access, 2017.
  6. Mangla and M. Singh, ?Effect of Scheduling Policies on Resource Allocation in Market Oriented Grid,? in 2012 International Conference on Computing Sciences, 2012, pp. 212?216.
  7. Zhou, Q. Sun, and J. Li, ?Enhancing reliability via checkpointing in cloud computing systems,? China Commun., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 108?117, 2017.
  8. Z. Santoso et al., ?Dynamic Resource Selection in Cloud Service Broker,? in 2017 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS), 2017, pp. 233?235.
  9. G. ? Daeyong Jung, SungHo Chin, KwangSik Chung, HeonChang Yu1, ?An Efficient Checkpointing Scheme Using Price History of Spot Instances in Cloud Computing Environment,? IFIP Int. Fed. Inf. Process., pp. 185?200, 2011.
  10. Xu, L. Cao, and X. Wang, ?Resource pre-allocation algorithms for low-energy task scheduling of cloud computing,? vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 457?469, 2016.
  11. Zhang, Z. Qian, Z. Luo, J. Wu, and S. Lu, ?Burstiness-Aware Resource Reservation for Server Consolidation in Computing Clouds,? vol. 9219, no. c, pp. 1?14, 2015.
  12. Aupy, A. Benoit, and Y. Robert, ?Energy-aware scheduling under reliability and makespan constraints,? 2012 19th Int. Conf. High Perform. Comput. HiPC 2012, 2012.
  13. Liu et al., ?Using Proactive Fault - Tolerance Approach to Enhance Cloud Service Reliability,? pp. 1?13, 2016.
  14. Transactions, O. N. C. Design, and O. F. Integrated, ?Reliability-Driven Energy-Efficient Task Scheduling for Multiprocessor Real-Time Systems,? vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1569?1573, 2011.
  15. Pop, K. H. Poulsen, V. Izosimov, and P. Eles, ?Scheduling and voltage scaling for energy/reliability trade-offs in fault-tolerant time-triggered embedded systems,? Proc. 5th IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Hardware/software codesign Syst. Synth. - CODES+ISSS ?07, p. 233, 2007.
  16. Zhou et al., ?Cloud Service Reliability Enhancement via Virtual Machine Placement Optimization,? IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. XX, no. XX, pp. 1?1, 2016.
  17. Portaluri and S. Giordano, ?A Power Efficient Genetic Algorithm for Resource Allocation in Cloud Computing Data Centers,? pp. 58?63, 2014.
  18. Choi, S. Member, B. Ahmed, R. Gutierrez-osuna, and S. Member, ?Development and Evaluation of an Ambulatory Stress Monitor Based on Wearable Sensors,? vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 279?286, 2012.
  19. Sharma, B. Javadi, W. Si, and D. Sun, ?Journal of Network and Computer Applications Reliability and energy ef fi ciency in cloud computing systems : Survey and taxonomy,? vol. 74, pp. 66?85, 2016.
  20. J. Charity, ?Resource Reliability using Fault Tolerance in Cloud Computing,? no. October, pp. 65?71, 2016.

How to Cite This Article

Kamalpreet Kaur and Kamaljit kaur. (2019); RELIABILITY AWARE MECHANISM TO ENSURE INCREASED FAULT TOLERANCE USING TEMPERATURE DRIVEN THROTTLE LOAD BALANCER., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 7 (05), 410-418, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9053

Corresponding Author

kamalpreet kaur

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.