Vol. 7 (07) pp. 441-451 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9379

VARIATION IN SOIL MACROFAUNA DIVERSITY IN THE DIFFERENT LAND USE TYPES IN NAMANYONYI SUB COUNTY, MBALE DISTRICT UGANDA

  • Islamic university in Uganda, department of environmental sciences, Mbale, 00256, Uganda.
  • Save the Nature Foundation, Nigeria.
42 Downloads 248 Views
Crossref

Abstract

This study was conducted in Namanyonyi Sub-county, Mbale district, Uganda. It compared: soil macrofauna abundance and diversity, the physicochemical properties of the soil, and earthworms and termites variability and biomass vis-à-vis the land use types (fallow, mixed cropping and eucalyptus plantation). Each land-use type was sampled for soil macrofauna using three methods (monolith, termites transect and pitfall traps). Thirteen species of invertebrates spread across 12 orders were recorded across the different land use types. The major macrofauna groups recorded included: Hymenoptera, Blattodea, Araneae, Orthoptera, Chilopoda, coleopteran, Diplopoda, Hemiptera, Dermaptera and pseudo-Scorpionida. Generally, Hymenoptera was the most abundant of the macrofauna groups constituting about (64.77%) of the total followed by Blattodea (22.69%). The other macrofauna (Araneae, Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Orthoptera, Blattidae, Hemiptera, Dermaptera, Mantodea and psudoscorpionida each constituted <10% of the total macrofauna recorded. Soil macro fauna was more diverse in eucalyptus land use types, followed by fallow and lastly mixed cropping. However, the reverse was also true for biomass. Soil chemical characteristics did not significantly vary across land use types (ANOVA, P>0.05). Pearson correlation showed that there is a moderate positive relationship between macro fauna biomass and calcium (r= 0.666. P< 0.05), The findings of this study seem to indicate that based on biomass, fallow is a better way of conserving invertebrate macrofauna while eucalyptus is the least and calcium levels in the soil determine the presence of these organisms.

How to Cite This Article

Faruk Usman Maiyaki, Sarah Nachuha and Aliyu Abubakar Shehu (2019); VARIATION IN SOIL MACROFAUNA DIVERSITY IN THE DIFFERENT LAND USE TYPES IN NAMANYONYI SUB COUNTY, MBALE DISTRICT UGANDA, International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 7 (07), 441-451, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9379

Corresponding Author

FARUKU USMAN MAIYAKI
ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY IN UGANDA

Article Analytics

References

  1. Barros, E., Pashanasi, B., Constantino, R. and Lavelle, P., (2002). Effects of land-use system on the soil macrofauna in western Brazilian Amazonia.?Biology and Fertility of Soils,?35(5), pp.338-347.
  2. Jim?nez, J.J., Rossi, J.P. and Lavelle, P., (2001). Spatial distribution of earthworms in acid-soil savannas of the eastern plains of Colombia.?Applied Soil Ecology,?17(3), pp.267-278.
  3. Lavelle, P., Barros, E., Blanchart, E., Brown, G., Desjardins, T., Mariani, L. and Rossi, J.P., (2001). SOM management in the tropics: Why feeding the soil macrofauna? In?Managing Organic Matter in Tropical Soils: Scope and Limitations(pp. 53-61). Springer, Dordrecht.
  4. Andersen, A., (2003). Long-term experiments with reduced tillage in spring cereals. II. Effects on pests and beneficial insects.?Crop Protection,?22(1), pp.147-152.
  5. Okwakol, M.J., (2000). Changes in termite (Isoptera) communities due to the clearance and cultivation of tropical forest in Uganda.?African Journal of Ecology,?38(1), pp.1-7
  6. Okwakol, M.J.N. and Sekamatte, M.B., (2007). Soil macrofauna research in ecosystems in Uganda.?African journal of ecology,?45, pp.2-8.
  7. Ayuke, F.O., Karanja, N.K., Muya, E.M., Musombi, B.K., Mungatu, J. and Nyamasyo, G.H.N., (2009). Macrofauna diversity and abundance across different land use systems in Embu, Kenya.?Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems,?11(2), pp.371-384.
  8. Vendrame, P.R.S., March?o, R.L., Brito, O.R., Guimar?es, M.D.F. and Becquer, T., (2009). Relationship between macrofauna, mineralogy and exchangeable calcium and magnesium in CerradoOxisols under pasture.?PesquisaAgropecu?riaBrasileira,?44(8), pp.996-1001.
  9. Lavelle, P., Dangerfield, M., Fragoso, C., Eschenbrenner, V., Lopez-Hernandez, D., Pashanasi, B. and Brussaard, L., (1994). The relationship between soil macrofauna and tropical soil fertility. In?The biological management of tropical soil fertility (pp. 137-169). Wiley.
  10. Zida, Z., Ou?draogo, E., Mando, A. and Stroosnijder, L., (2011). Termite and earthworm abundance and taxonomic richness under long-term conservation soil management in Saria, Burkina Faso, West Africa.?Applied Soil Ecology,?51, pp.122-129.
  11. Sileshi, G. and Mafongoya, P.L., (2006). Variation in macrofaunal communities under contrasting land use systems in eastern Zambia.?Applied Soil Ecology,?33(1), pp.49-60.
  12. Mehlich, A., (1984). Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant.?Communications in soil science and plant analysis,?15(12), pp.1409-1416.
  13. Okalebo, J.R., Gathua, K.W. and Woomer, P.L., (2002). Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: a working manual second edition.?Sacred Africa, Nairobi, p.21.
  14. Anderson, J.M. and Ingram, J.S.I., (1993). A handbook of methods.?CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire,?221.