GLOBALIZATION, MULTIMODAL COMPOSITION, AND FEMINISM.

  • Tribhuvan University.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Globalization is a complex phenomenon incorporating myriads socio-economic and cultural implications. The proponents of globalization only posit its benefits and cite instances of how the global traffic of ideas and capital has benefitted all nation states. Its critics are overtly critical about it. They argue that globalization is a neo-colonization project used by the rich and the powerful states to further hegemonize the weaker nation sates. In other words, the rewards of globalization are reaped only by powerful states. There are, however, some who adopt a middle path to show what works with globalization and what doesn?t, and that it has its own pros and cons. This paper will lean on scholars like Amartya Sen, John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge, and John L. McKnigh among others to analyze socio-economic dimensions of globalization, particularly paying attention to multimodal composition, and feminism and how globalization is impacting the way teaching learning takes place in classrooms across the globe.

  1. Bhusal, A. (2019). Addressing FYC instructors' lack of technological expertise in implementing multimodal assignments. In?Marginalia in Modern Learning Contexts(pp. 166-186). IGI Global.
  2. Bhusal, A. (2017). Emphasizing the Suppression of Feminist Voices.?International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies4(2), 53-57.
  3. Bhusal, A. (2010). Genre awareness in the writing center. MA Thesis, Department of English, Eastern Illinois University, Illinois.
  4. Bhusal, A. (2017). The Rhetoric of racism and anti-miscegenation laws in the United States. IAFOR Journal of Arts and Humanities. 4(2).
  5. Bhusal, A. (2019). The rhetoric of racism in society. Journal of Research Innovation. 9(1).
  6. Duggan, L. (2012).?The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Beacon Press.IAFOR Journal of Arts & Humanities, 4(2), 83-89.
  7. Gray, J. (2015).?False dawn: The delusions of global capitalism. Granta Books.
  8. Kupchan, A. C. (2012). The democratic malaise: Globalisation and the threat to the West. Foreign Affairs. Ed. Rose, Gideon. Council of Foreign Affairs, 91, 62-67.
  9. Lechner, Frank J. and John Boli. Introduction. The Globalization Reader. By Lechner and Boli. Ed. Frank J. and John Boli. 3rd Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. 1-5.
  10. Lohani, S. (2019). The History of Multimodal Composition, Its Implementation, and Challenges. The Criterion: An International Journal in English 10 (1).
  11. Lohani, S. (2019). Constructing Nontraditional Rhetoric: Critical Study on Gloria Anzaldua and Suresh Canagarajah. Journal of Research Innovation, 9 (1).
  12. McKnight, J. L. (1984). John Deere and the bereavement counselor.?Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society,?4(6), 597-604.
  13. Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A. ?The Hidden Promise: Liberty Renewed.? Ed. Frank J. Lechner and John Boli. The Globalization Reader. 3rd Oxford: Blackwell.
  14. Riedner, R. C. (2015).?Writing neoliberal values: Rhetorical connectivities and globalized capitalism. Springer.Publishing, 2008. 11-18.
  15. Sen, A. (2008). How to Judge Globalization. Ed. Frank J. Lechner and John Boli. The globalization reader. 3rd Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 19-24.
  16. Steger, M. B. (2008). Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: OUP, 2003.Lechner, Frank J. and John Boli. The Globalization Reader. 3rd Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  17. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002).?Globalization and its discontents(Vol. 500). Norton: New York.

[Arjun Kumal. (2019); GLOBALIZATION, MULTIMODAL COMPOSITION, AND FEMINISM. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Aug). 849-854] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Arjun B. Kumal
Tribhuvan University

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9570      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9570

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 14 | No. of Views: 116