23Dec 2019

COMPARISON OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS PRODUCED BY WAVEONE GOLD AND PROTAPER NEXT AFTER USING MECHANICAL OR MANUAL GLIDE PATH TECHNIQUES

  • Restorative & Dental Material Department, National Research Centre
  • Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University
  • Restorative & Dental Material Department, National Research Centre. Orcid number 0000-0001-6505-2854
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Aim: To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris produced byWaveOne Gold (WOG) and ProTaper Next (PTN) after using mechanical or manual glide path techniques. Methodology: Forty freshly extracted human permanent mandibular first molars were collected and randomly assigned into one of the two main groups (I&II) (n=20 for each group) according to the instrumentation techniques used using either the WOG or the PTN, then each group was randomly subdivided into two subgroups (A&B) (n=10 for each subgroup) according to the type of instrument used to create the glide path using either the PathFiles (PF) or the K-Files (KF). During instrumentation, the apically extruded debris (AED) was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. Then tubes were incubated at 70? C for 5 days. The net weight of the apically extruded debris was calculated in gram by subtracting the pre-weight of the empty tubes from the post-weight. The data were statistically analyzed. Results: Using the WOG/KF was statistically significantly associated with the highest amount of the AED followed by the PTN/KF and WOG/PF with no significant difference between them while the PTN/PF was statistically significantly associated with lowest amount of the AED. Conclusions: Although all systems caused apical extrusion of debris, using the multi-file continuous rotary system with mechanical glide path files could be considered as a promising and reliable approach to prepare the root canal with less amount of debris extruded apically.

  1. Wu H, Peng C, Bai Y, Hu X, Wang L, Li C. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals. BMC Oral Health. 2015;1:15-27.
  2. Rao NK, Kandaswamy R, Umashetty G, Rathore SPV, Hotkar C, Patil SB. Post-obturation pain following one-visit and two-visit root canal treatment in necrotic anterior teeth. J Int Oral Health. 2014; 6(2): 28?32.
  3. Shivanna V, Nilegaonkar R. The effect of two continuous rotary and one reciprocating file systems on the incidence of postoperative pain after single-visit endodontic treatment. Int J Oral Health Sci. 2015;5:4-8.
  4. De-Deus G, Neves A, Silva EJ, Mendon?a TA, Louren?o C, Calixto C, Lima EJ. Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system.Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(2):357-61.
  5. Ruddle CJ. Single-FileShapingTechnique: Achieving a GoldMedalResult.Dent Today.2016;35(1):98, 100, 102-3.
  6. Pasqualini D, Mollo L, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Migliaretti G, Berutti E. Postoperative Pain after Manual and Mechanical Glide Path: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J 2012; 38:32?6.
  7. Schneider S.W. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-5.
  8. Fairbourn DR, McWalter GM, Montgomery S. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris. J Endod. 1987;13(3): 102-8.
  9. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filling and canal master techniques. J Endod. 1991;17(6):275-9.
  10. Surakanti JR, Venkata RP, Vemisetty HK, Dandolu RK, Jaya NM, Thota S. Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper, Hyflex and Waveone rotary systems. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:129-32.
  11. Sowmya HK, Subhash TS, Goel BR, Nandini TN, Shilpa H, Bhandi SH. Quantitative assessment of apical debris extrusion and intracanal debris in the apical third, using hand instrumentation and three rotary instrumentation systems.J ClinDiagn Res. 2014;8(2):206-10.
  12. Abdallah MA, Zaazou AM, Mokhless NA. A comparative study of the amount of apically extruded debris after using different types of glide path files. Alex Dent J. 2017; 42:80-4.
  13. Ko?ak MM, ?i?ek E, Ko?ak S, Sağlam BC, Yılmaz N. Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems. IntEndod J. 2015;48(3):283-6.
  14. Hoppe CB, Bottcher DE, Justo AM, So MV, Grecca FS. Comparison of curved root canals preparation using reciprocating, continuous and an association of motions. Scanning. 2016;38:462?8.
  15. Yeter KY, Evcil MS, Ayranci LB, Ersoy I. Weight of apically extruded debris following use of two canal instrumentation techniques and two designs of irrigation needles. IntEndod J. 2013;46:795?9.
  16. Nevares G, Xavier F, Gominho L, Cavalcanti F, Cassimiro M, Romeiro K, Alvares P, Queiroz G, Sobral AP, Gerbi M, Silveira M, Albuquerque D.Apical Extrusion of Debris Produced during Continuous Rotating and Reciprocating Motion.ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:267264.
  17. Jindal R, Singh S, Gupta S, Jindal P. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant with three rotary instruments using crown down technique?An in vitro study. J Oral BiolCraniofac Res. 2012;2(2): 105-9.
  18. Uzunoglu E, Turker SA, G?rduysus M. Effects of Different Rotary Files Combined with Different Irrigation Needles on Apically Extruded Debris. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(4):347-50.
  19. Pawar AM, Pawar MG, Metzger Z, Kokate SR. The self-adjusting file instrumentation results in less debris extrusion apically when compared to WaveOne and ProTaper NEXT. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(2):89-93.
  20. Top?uoğlu HS, Zan R, Akpek F, Top?uoğlu G, Ulusan ?, Aktı A, D?zg?n S, Ağırnaslıgil M.Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments.IntEndod J. 2016;49(12):1183-7.
  21. Kirchhoff AL, Fariniuk LF, Mello I.Apicalextrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2015;41(2):237-41.
  22. Verma M, Meena N, Kumari RA, Mallandur S, Vikram R, Gowda V. Comparison of apicaldebrisextrusion during root canal preparation using instrumentation techniques with two operating principles. An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(2):96-9.
  23. ?i?ek E, Ko?ak MM, Ko?ak S, Sağlam BC, T?rker SA. Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(1):20-6.
  24. Elmsallati EA, Wadachi R, Suda H. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel titanium files with different pitch: A pilot study. AustEndod J. 2009;35(2):65-9.
  25. Robinson JP1, Lumley PJ, Cooper PR, Grover LM, Walmsley AD. Reciprocating root canal technique induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by 3-dimensional micro-computed tomography. J Endod. 2013;39(8):1067-70.
  26. B?rklein S, Sch?fer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2012; 38: 850-2.
  27. Abou El Nasr HM, Gawdat SI. Debris extrusion from severely curved root canals after instrumentation with WaveOne Gold or OneShape single files. Egypt Dent J. 2017;63(3):53-9.
  28. Tomer AK , Mangat P, Mullick S, Dubey S, Chauhan P, Kumari A, Rana S, Vaidya S. Quantitative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris of Different Single File Systems: Wave One Gold, One Shape, F360, and Reciproc: An in vitro Study. IJOCR. 2017;5(1):1-3.
  29. Uzun I, G?ler B, ?zy?rek T, Tun? T. Apical extrusion of debris using reciprocating files and rotary instrumentation systems. Niger J ClinPract. 2016;19:71-5.
  30. Van der Vyver P, Vorster M.WaveOne Gold reciprocating instruments: clinical application in the private practice: Part 1. Int Dentistry ? African edition. 2017;7(4): 6-19.
  31. Ruddle CJ, Machtou P, West JD. The shaping movement: fifth-generation technology. Dent Today. 2013;32(4):94, 96-9.
  32. Karataş E, Ersoy İ, G?nd?z HA, Uygun AD, Kol E, ?akıcı F. Influence of Instruments Used in Root Canal Preparation on Amount of Apically Extruded Debris. Artif Organs. 2016;40(8):774-7.
  33. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. IntEndod J. 2008;41:339?44.
  34. Dincer AN, Guneser MB, Arslan D. Apical extrusion of debris during root canal preparation using a novel nickel-titanium file system: WaveOne gold. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20:322-5.
  35. Jain D, Medha A, Patil N, Kadam N, Yadav V, Jagadale H. Shaping Ability of the Fifth Generation Ni-Ti Rotary Systems for Root Canal Preparation in Curved Root Canals using Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic: An In Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2015; 7: 57?61.
  36. ?i?ek E, Akkocan O, Furuncuoglu F. Comparison of apically extruded debris associated with several nickel-titanium systems after determining working length by apex locator. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(1):68-71.
  37. Costa EL, Sponchiado-J?nior EC, Garcia LFR, Marques AAF. Effect of large instrument use on shaping ability and debris extrusion of rotary and reciprocating systems. J InvestigClin Dent. 2018;9(1) :e12289.
  38. Ko?ak MM, ?i?ek E, Ko?ak S, Sağlam BC, Furuncuoğlu F.Comparison of ProTaper Next and HyFlex instruments on apical debris extrusion in curved canals.IntEndod J. 2016;49(10):996-1000.
  39. Ozsu D, Karatas E, Arslan H, Topcu MC. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(4):504-8.
  40. Silva EJ, Carapi? MF, Lopes RM, Belladonna FG, Senna PM, Souza EM, De-Deus G. Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems. IntEndod J. 2016;49(7):700-5.
  41. Ha JH, Kim SK, Kwak SW, El Abed R, Bae YC, Kim HC. Debris extrusion by glide-path establishing endodontic instruments with different geometries. J Dent Sci. 2016;11:136?40.
  42. Abdallah MA, Zaazou AM, Mokhless NA. A comparative study of the amount of apically extruded debris after using different types of glide path files. Alex Dent J. 2017; 42:80-4.
  43. Madhusudhana K, Mathew VB, Reddy NM. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems − An in vitro study. ContempClin Dent. 2010;1(4):234-6.
  44. Dhingra A, Neetika. Glide path in endodontics. Endodontology. 2014; 26(1): 217- 22.
  45. Dass A, Saxena A, Chandak M, Bhatia C, Shrivastava S.Quantatitative assessment of apical debris extrusion in apical third using two different NiTi rotary systems- An in vitro study. IJOHD.2016; 2(4):220-3.
  46. T?rker SA, Ko?ak S, MuratKo?ak M, Sağlam BC. Effect of glide path preparation on apical debris extrusion of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems: OneShape versus WaveOne. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2015;18(1):1-8.
  47. Pawar AM, Pawar M, Kfir A, Thakur B, Mutha P, Banga KS.Effect of glide path preparation on apical extrusion of debris in root canals instrumented with three single-file systems: An ex vivo comparative study.J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(2):110-4.
  48. Chandrasekhar M, Reddy SNL, Moosani GK, Reddy NU, Nikhita K, Kumar MP. Influence of Rotary and reciprocating glide path techniques on the incidence of dentinal crack formation? an in vitro study. IJCMR. 2016;3(7):2075-8.
  49. Van der Vyver P. Creating a glide path for rotary NiTi instruments: part one. Int Dentistry SA. 2011; 13(2): 6-10.
  50. Ruddle CJ, Machtou P, West JD.Endodontic canal preparation: endodontic canal preparation: new innovations in glide path management and shaping canals. Dent Today. 2014;33(7):118-23.
  51. Labbaf H, Shakeri L, Orduie R, Bastami F. Apical Extrusion of Debris after Canal Preparation with Hand-Files Used Manually or Installed on Reciprocating Air-Driven Handpiece in Straight and Curved Canals.Iran Endod J. 2015;10(3):165-8.
  52. ?st?n Y, ?anak?i BC, Din?er AN, Er O, D?zg?n S. Evaluation of apically extruded debris associated with several Ni?Ti systems. IntEndod J. 2015;48(7):701-4.

[Shaimaa Rabea, Wael Hussein Kamel, Mohsen M. Nour El Din and Nehal Farouk Sharaf (2019); COMPARISON OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS PRODUCED BY WAVEONE GOLD AND PROTAPER NEXT AFTER USING MECHANICAL OR MANUAL GLIDE PATH TECHNIQUES Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Dec). 1062-1071] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

Dr. Shaimaa Rabea
Assistant Researcher of Endodontics, Restorative & Dental Material Department, National Research Center.

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10255      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10255

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 42 | No. of Views: 171