PROGRAM EVALUATION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OF INDONESIAN NAVY SUPPLY OFFICER : CONTEXT PHASE

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

The purpose of this research was to evaluate human resource management program of Indonesian Navy Supply officer corps. Indonesian Navy has eight branches of corps of to fulfill its tasks and goals. In 2001 Supply corps has been named formally replacing administration corps and since that time there was no formal evaluation has ever been made. This is a qualitative research using Context Input Process Product (CIPP) model but this paper research is only focus to context phase. Data are collected through observations, focus group discussions, dialogues,andsurvey questions. The result of this context thatit is stated on the Indonesian legislation law no 34 of 2004 article 9 about the task of Indonesian navy. In order to do the tasks Indonesian navy officers should have a proper competence in terms of duty, rank, education and psychology.Even though, the navy has not only a clear planning documents phase such as working planning frame works but also rules and regulation concerning how to manage human resource. But there is no such as a clear link between each other. After all, it is clear that the program is vital and significant for the navy and need to be refined in the near future.

  1. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  2. Alkin, M. C. (2004). Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theoritists, Views and Influences. UK: Sage Publication Lts.
  3. Alwi, S. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Strategi Keunggulan Kompetitif. Yogyakarta: Badan Peneribut Fakultas Ekonomi.
  4. Amstrong, M. (2012). Amstrong Handbook's of Human Resourches Management. Hong Kong: Graphicraft Limited.
  5. Arikunto, S. dan Safrudin, C. (2009). Evalausi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan, Edisis Kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  6. Arikunto, S. dan Safrudin, C. (2009). Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  7. R. C. dan Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
  8. Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1986). The Program Evaluation: a Practioner's Guide for Traineers and Educationer,Fourth Edition. Boston: Kluwer Nijboff Publishing.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. New York: Sage Publications Inc.
  10. Denzim, N. K. dan Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
  11. Dessler, G. (2013). Human Resources Management. US: Pearson.
  12. Djaali, P. M. dan Ramiy. (2000). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
  13. Fitzpatrick, J. L., dkk. (1995). Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Pearson.
  14. Gallwey, T. (2003). Coaching Guide. Welsh Government: Public Service Management Wales.
  15. Gomes, F. C. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  16. Harris, M. J. (2010). Evaluating Public and Community Health Programs. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
  17. Hasan, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.
  18. Hasibuan, M. S. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  19. Huba, E. G. (1981). Effective Evaluation: Improving the Useulneess of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic. California: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  20. Issac, S. dan Michael, W. B. (1982). Handbook in Research and Evaluation, 2nd Edition. California: Edits Publisher.
  21. Jackson, J. H. dan Mathis, R. L. (2012). Human Resourches Management, 13th Edition. Boston: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  22. Kaufman, R. dan Thomas, S. (1980). Evaluating without Fear. London: New Viewpoints.
  23. Kussriyanto, B. (2007). Meningkatkan Produktivitas Karyawan. Jakarta: Pustaka Binaan.
  24. (t.thn.). Lampiran Keputusan Pengab No. Kep/06/X/1991 Tanggal 5 Oktober 1991 tentang Petunjuk Pembinaan Prajurit ABRI.
  25. (t.thn.). Lampiran Keputusan Pengab Nomor: Kep/06/X/1991 tentang Buku Petunjuk Dasar Pembinaan Prajurit ABRI.
  26. Lincoln, Y. S. dan Guba, E. G. (1985). Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.
  27. Mangkunegara, A. P. (2009). Manajemen SUmber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  28. McClelland, D. C. (2005). The Achieving Society. New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company Inc.
  29. Moeleong, L. J. dan Ying, R. K. (2006). Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  30. Moeloeng, L. J. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  31. (2001). Manajemen Kepegawaiaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.
  32. Nasution, S. (2003). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.
  33. Nawawi, H. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Bisnis yang Kompetitif. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  34. Netisimito, A. S. (2011). Manajemen Personalia: Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Ghalia.
  35. (2011). Manajemen dan Evaluasi Kerja. Jakarta: Layanan Penerbit FE, Universitas Indonesia.
  36. Poerwadarminta, W. J. (2006). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
  37. (t.thn.). PUM-6.05.011 Keputusan Kasal nomor Kep/1700/XII/2014 tanggal 3 Desember 2014 tentang Buku Petunjuk Teknis Pembinaan Perwira Korps Suplai TNI Angkatan Laut.
  38. Rivai, V. dan Sagala, E. J. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan: dari Teori ke Praktik, edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  39. Rivai, Veithal dan Sagala, E. J. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  40. Rutman, L. (1984). Evaluation Research Methodology. New Delhi: Sage Publication India, PVT. LTD.
  41. Sanders, J. R., dkk. (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards, 2nd Edition. California: Sage Publication Inc.
  42. Schuler, R. dan Jackson, S. E. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Menghadapi Abad ke-21) Terjemahan Susanto. Jakarta: Gelora Aksara Pratama.
  43. Shaunghnessy, J. J., dan Zeichmeister, J. S. (2012). Research Methods in Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  44. Simamora, H. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIE TKPN.
  45. Stake, R. E. (2003). The Countenance of Education Evaluation. Paper, Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, University of Illinois.
  46. Steward, G. L. dan Brown, K. G. (2011). Human Resources Management: Linking Strategy to Practice, 2nd Edution. US: John Wiley & Sons.
  47. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). Evaluation Models, Viewpoints on Educational and Human Service Evaluation Second Edition. New York, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  48. (2006). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  49. Sudjana, D. (2006). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: PT. Rordakarya.
  50. (2014). Metode Penelitain Kuantitatif, Kualititatif dan RnD. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  51. Sutikno, M. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: PPs UNJ.
  52. Syaodih, N. S. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  53. Tanzeh, A. (2009). Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Teras.
  54. Tayeb, M. H. (2005). Human Resource Management: A Multinational Company Perspective. UK: Oxford University.
  55. Tayibnafis, F. Y. (2008). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi: untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  56. Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2000). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  57. Ted, W. dan Richard D. (2006). Pembelajaran Efektif. Terjemahan: Mustopo. Jakarta: Grasindo.
  58. Thoha, M. (2003). Kepemimpinan dalam Manajemen. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  59. Thoha, M. (2003). Pembinaan Organisasi Proses Diagnosa dan Interval. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  60. Thoha, M. (2014). Pembinaan Organisasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  61. Wahyudi, B. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Penerbit Sulita.
  62. (2012). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  63. Widjaja, A. W. (2006). Administrasi Kepegawaian. Jakarta: Rajawali.
  64. Williams, D. D. (1988). When is Naturalistic Evaluation Appropriate? New Direction for Program Evaluation. Education Article No.30, 85-101.
  65. Zainal, V. R., dkk. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan: dari Teori ke Praktik, edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  66. Zhang, G. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, adn Assesment of Service-learning Program. Journal of High Education Outreach and Engagement Vol.15 No.4.

[Diki Atriana, Billy Tunas and Tuty Sariwulan (2020); PROGRAM EVALUATION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OF INDONESIAN NAVY SUPPLY OFFICER : CONTEXT PHASE Int. J. of Adv. Res. 8 (Jan). 1125-1130] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com

diki atriana, Billy Tunas, Tuty Sariwulan

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10412      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10412

Download Full Paper

Download PDF No. of Downloads: 19 | No. of Views: 60