EVALUATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCYS WORK PROGRAM AT STAI MU TANJUNGPINANG
- Universitas Negeri Jakarta
- Abstract
- Keywords
- References
- How to Cite This Article
- Corresponding Author
This research is focused on evaluating the implementation of quality policy and work program of LPM STAI MU Tanjungpinang. Based on the focus of the research, the general objectives are broken down into specific objectives, among others, to improve the legal basis, objectives, targets and strategies of the Tanjung Pinang MU LAI STAI work program. Improve infrastructure procurement policies, as well as increase budget and monitoring, leaders, lecturers, staff, improve the policy implementation process, LPM at STAI MU Tanjungpinang. This research is a type of evaluation research with a qualitative approach using the CIPP model through stages of context, input, process, and product. The results of this study relate to LPM work program policies contained in the Statute of STAI Miftahul Ulum Tanjungpinang regarding the organizational structure of the civil service governance that is built in a credible, transparent, accountable manner.
- Asian Development Bank. (2012). Private Higher Education Across Asia: Expanding Access, Searching for Quality. Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
- Brown, R. (2004). Quality Assurance in Higher Education The UK Experience Since 1992. London: Routledge Falmer.
- Jin, Y. (2014). Educational administration management system and modern education management on the perspective of modern information technology. Information Technology Journal, 13(2), 340?346. https://doi.org/10.3923/itj,2014.340.346.
- Undang-Undang Ri Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia, Pub. L. No. 20, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional 1 (2003). Jakarta: UU. Retrieved from http://kelembagaan.ristekdikti.go.id/wp-content/ uploads/ 2016/08/UU_no_20_th_2003.pdf.
- Suharsimi Arikunto. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pedoman Teoretis praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
- Khandker, R. Shahidur., Koolwal, B. Gayatri., Samad, A. H. (2010). Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington: The World Bank.
- Coryn, S. and. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Application ? Second Edition. San Francisco: A Wiley Brand.
- Charles Hoy, C. B.-J. and M. W. (2005). Improving Quality in Education. London and New York: Palmer Press.
- Jones, C. O. (1996). Pengantar Kebijakan Publik (Public Policy). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
- Suarez, G. (2000). Three Experts on Quality Management. Arlington: Departement of Navy.
- Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology : integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. 3rd ed. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Mohsin, N. Mohammad., Khan, M. Tariq., Awan, S. Ahmed., Doger, H. A. (2011). Human Resource Management: Comparative Study Between Public And Private Universities In Austria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(12), 263?271.
- Scott, D & Usher, R. (2011). Researching education: data, methods and theory in educational enquiry? 2nd ed. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Wildschut, L. P. (2014). Theory-based evaluation, logic modelling and the experience of SA non-governmental organisations. Stellenbosch University.
- Russo, C. J. (2013). Encyclopedia of law and higher education. Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 48). SAGE Publications, Inc: Los Angeles. https:// doi.org/ 10.5860/ choice.48-0044
- Turner, A. D. (2011). Quality in Higher Education. Taipei: Sense Publisher.
Syamsul Bahri, Bedjo Sujanto and Madhakomala (2020); EVALUATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCYS WORK PROGRAM AT STAI MU TANJUNGPINANG, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 8 (01), 508-518, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10322
Universitas Negeri Jakarta
