Vol. 8 (01) pp. 986-997 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10392

ENDODONTIC IRRIGATING SOLUTIONS, DISINFECTION DEVICES AND TECHNIQUES : A REVIEW

, and
  • (Post Graduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India - 575018).
  • (MDS, Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India - 575018).
  • (MDS, Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India - 575018).
58 Downloads 240 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Article Analytics

References

  1. Arias-Moliz MT, Ordinola-Zapata R, Baca P, RuizLinares M, Ferrer-Luque CM. Antimicrobial activity of a sodium hypochlorite/etidronic acid irrigant solution. J Endod. 2014;40(12):1999?2002.
  2. Autegarden JE, Pecquet C, Huet S, Bayrou O, Leynadier F. Anaphylactic shock after application of chlorhexidine to unbroken skin. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:215?7.
  3. Baker NE, Liewehr FR, Buxton TB, Joyce AP. Antibacterial effi cacy of calcium hydroxide, iodine potassium iodide, betadine, and betadine scrub with and without surfactant against E faecalis in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98:359.
  4. Barbosa CA, Goncalves RB, Siqueira Jr JF, De Uzeda M. Evaluation of the antibacterial activities of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine, and camphorated paramonochlorophenol as intracanal medicament. A clinical and laboratory study. J Endod. 1997;23: 297?300.
  5. Basrani B, Ghanem A, Tj?derhane L. Physical and chemical properties of chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide-containing medications. J Endod. 2004;30: 413?7.
  6. Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV: The effectiveness of four  clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal  debris, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 54:323, 1982.
  7. Adcock J, Sidow S, Looney S, et al: Histologic evaluation  of canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two  different irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system,   J Endod 37:544, 2011.
  8. Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, et al: Interaction  between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate,  J Endod 33:966, 2007.
  9. Beltz RE, Torabinejad M, Pouresmail M: Quantitative  analysis of the solubilizing action   of MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and EDTA on bovine pulp  and dentin, J Endod 29:334, 2003.
  10. Peters LB, van Winkelhoff AJ, Buijs JF, Wesselink PR. Effects of instrumentation, irrigation and dressing with calcium hydroxide on infection in pulpless teeth with periapical bone lesions. Int Endod J. 2002; 35:13?21.
  11. Trope M, Delano E, ?rstavik D. Endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: single vs. multivisit treatment. J Endod. 1999;25:345.
  12. Weiger R, Rosendahl R, L?st C. Infl uence of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressings on the prognosis of teeth with endodontically induced periapical lesions. Int Endod J. 2000;33:219?26.
  13. Bystr?m A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the effi cacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Eur J Oral Sci. 1981;1981(89):321?8.
  14. Gopikrishna V, Pare S, Pradeep Kumar A, Lakshmi Narayanan L. Irrigation protocol among endodontic faculty and post-graduate students in dental colleges of India: a survey. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(5): 394?8.
  15. Grawehr M, Sener B, Waltimo T, Zehnder M. Interactions of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid with sodium hypochlorite in aqueous solutions. Int Endod J. 2003;36:411?7.
  16. Greenstein G, Berman C, Jaffi n R. Chlorhexidine. An adjunct to periodontal therapy. J Periodontol. 1986;57:370?5.
  17. Grossman L, Meiman B. Solution of pulp tissue by chemical agent. J Am Dent Assoc. 1941;28:223.
  18. G ulabivala K, Ng Y-L, Gilbertson M, Eames I. The fl uid mechanics of root canal irrigation. Physiol Meas. 2010;31:R49.
  19. Gulabivala K, Patel B, Evans G, et al. Effects of mechanical and chemical procedures on root canal surfaces. Endod Top. 2005;10:103?22.
  20. Haapasalo HK, Sir?n EK, Waltimo TM, ?rstavik D, Haapasalo MP. Inactivation of local root canal medicaments by dentine: an in vitro study. Int Endod J. 2000;33(2):126?31.
  21. Haapasalo M. Can I use chlorhexidine as the only irrigating solution in my endodontic treatments? J Can Dent Assoc. 2011;77:b16.
  22. Haznedaroglu F, Ersev H. Tetracycline HCl solution as a root canal irrigant. J Endod. 2001;27:738.
  23. Heling I, Chandler NP. Antimicrobial effect of irrigant combinations within dentinal tubules. Int Endod J. 1998;31:8.
  24. Hennessey TS. Some antibacterial properties of chlorhexidine. J Periodontal Res Suppl. 1973;12: 61?7.
  25. Hjeljord LG, Rolla G, Bonesvoll P. Chlorhexidineprotein interactions. J Periodontal Res Suppl. 1973; 12:11?6.
  26. Singla MG, Garg A, Gupta S. MTAD in endodontics: an update review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112(3): e70−e76. 24.
  27. Malkhassian G, Manzur AJ, Legner M et al. Antibacterial efficacy of MTAD final rinse and two percent chlorhexidine gel medication in teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized doubleblinded clinical trial. J Endod 2009; 35(11): 1483−1490.
  28. Basrani B, Haapasalo M. Update on endodontic irrigating solutions. Endod Topics 2012; 27(1): 74−102.
  29. Frais S, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Some factors affecting the concentration of available chlorine in commercial sources of sodium hypochlorite. Int Endod J 2001; 34(3): 206−215.
  30. Hsieh Y, Gau C, Kung Wu S et al. Dynamic recording of irrigating fluid distribution in root canals using thermal image analysis. Int Endod J 2007; 40(1): 11−17. 38.
  31. Tay FR, Gu L-S, Schoeffel GJ et al. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positivepressure irrigant delivery. J Endod 2010; 36(4): 745−750.
  32. Parente J, Loushine R, Susin L et al. Root canal debridement using manual dynamic agitation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a closed system and an open system. Int Endod J 2010; 43(11): 1001−1012.
  33. Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Gliksberg J. An in vitro evaluation of the irrigating characteristics of ultrasonic and subsonic handpieces and irrigating needles and probes. J Endod 1995; 21(5): 277−280. 48.
  34. Jensen SA, Walker TL, Hutter JW et al. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod 1999; 25(11): 735−738. 49.
  35. Haapasalo M, Wang Z, Shen Y et al. Tissue dissolution by a novel multisonic ultracleaning system and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2014; 40:1178−1181. 50.
  36. Ar?valo‐Silva C, Eliashar R, Wohlgelernter J et al. Ingestion of caustic substances: a 15year experience. The Laryngoscope 2006; 116(8): 1422−1426. 51.
  37. Mehdipour O, Kleier DDJ, Averbach DRE et al. Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents. Choice 2007; 5(8): 9. 52.
  38. H?lsmann M, R?dig T, Nordmeyer S. Complications during root canal irrigation. Endod Topics 2007; 16(1): 27−63. 50.
  39. Waltimo TM, ?rstavik D, Siren EK, Haapasalo MP. In vitro susceptibility of Candida albicans to four disinfectants and their combinations. Int Endod J 1999;32:421?9.
  40. Vianna ME, Gomes BP, Berber VB, et al. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:79?84.
  41. GomesBP,FerrazCC,ViannaME,etal.Invitroantimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2001;34:424?8.
  42. Portenier I, Waltimo T, ?rstavik D, Haapasalo M. The susceptibility of starved, stationary phase, and growing cells of Enterococcus faecalis to endodontic medicaments. J Endod 2005;31:380?6.
  43. Bystro ?m A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent sodium hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1983;55:307?12.
  44. Bystro ?m A, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 1985;18: 35?40.
  45. Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Santos SR, et al. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod 2002;28:181?4.
  46. Spa ˚ngberg L, Engstro ?m B, Langeland K. Biologic effects of dental materials. 3. Toxicity and antimicrobial effect of endodontic antiseptics in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1973;36:856?71.
  47. McComb D, Smith DC, Beagrie GS. The results of in vivo endodontic chemomechanical instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Br Endod Soc 1976;9:11?18.
  48. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH. Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod 1985;11:525?8.
  49. Chang YC, Huang FM, Tai KW, Chou MY. The effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on cultured human periodontal ligament cells. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:446?50.
  50. Czonstkowsky M, Wilson EG, Holstein FA. The smear layer in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:13?25.
  51. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 1987;13:147?57.
  52. Niu W, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. A scanning electron microscopic study of dentinal erosion by final irrigation with EDTA and NaOCl solutions. Int Endod J 2002;35:934?9.

How to Cite This Article

Joseph Mampilly, Vidyadhar Shetty and K. Harish S. Shetty (2020); ENDODONTIC IRRIGATING SOLUTIONS, DISINFECTION DEVICES AND TECHNIQUES : A REVIEW, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 8 (01), 986-997, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10392

Corresponding Author

Joseph Mampilly
Postgraduate student (conservative dentistry and endodontics)
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.