19Feb 2020

DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES TREATED WITH RETROGRADE FEMORAL NAIL

  • M.D. Arab Board, Orthopedic Department Al Jalaa Trauma Hospital, Faculty of Medicine -Benghazi University.
  • M.D. Arab Board, M.D. Libyan Board Orthopedics, Assistant Professor Faculty of Medicine Benghazi University - Benghazi .Hawari General Hospital , Orthopedic Department.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively review and evaluate the results of retrograde femoral nail for distal femur fractures with respect to range of knee flexion, early ambulation, and long term rehabilitation outcome including daily activities. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 44 fractures of distal femur (AO classification type 33) in 43 patients treated by retrograde femoral nail at our Trauma Hospital between 2011 and 2017. Fractures consisted of type A1 (n=20), type A3 (n=17), type C1 (n=5), and type C2 (n=2). There were 37 closed (84%), seven open (16%), and four pathologic (9.1%) fractures. Mean age of patients was 43.8years (range 16 to 83 year).The mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident in 22 patients (51.2%),fall down in 12 patients (27.9%), and firearm injuries in 9 patients (20.9%). Associated fractures were seen in 14 patients (32.6%). Mean time to surgery was 7 days (range 2 to 15 days).Percutaneous technique was used in 39 (88.6%), and open technique used in 5 (11.4%) fractures. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Hospital for Special Surgery knee scale. Relationship between clinical results and fracture type, surgical approach, and patient age were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Thirty eight patients were followed (38/43 with 39fractures) for a mean period of 24.8months (range 16 to 58 months). Average operating time was 115min?40 min. Four patients developed superficial infection, and one had deep infection, and 3 developed deep vein thrombosis. The mean time to union was 23 weeks (range 16 to 40 weeks). Delayed union was seen in four fractures (10.3%, more than 42 weeks). Five fractures (12.8%) required second surgery. The range of knee motion was normal in ten fractures (25.6%), 90?- 110? in 21 fractures (538%), 85? in five fractures (12.8%), and <85? in three fractures (7.7%). Using modified hospital for special surgery scale the results were excellent in11(28.2%), good in 14(35.9%), moderate in 10(25.6%), and poor in 4(10.3%) fractures.There were five fractures with varus deformity ( 12.8%, 10?), two with posterior angulation( 5.1%, 10?-15?), and two with loosening of distal and proximal locking screws, but no breakage of screws or nail failure. Conclusion: Retrograde femoral nail is good surgical option for distal femur fractures of type A and type C1, 2 AO classification.


  1. Handolin L, Pajarinen J, Lindahl Jan, et al. Retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures-results in a series of 46 consecutive operations. Injury 2004; 35 (5): 517-22.
  2. Neubauer TH, Ritter E, Potschka TH et al. Retrograde Nailing of Femoral Fractures. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae 2008; 75: 158?166.
  3. Reina R, Vilella FE, Ramirez N, et al. Knee pain and leg-length discrepancy after retrograde femoral nailing, Am J Orthop 2007; 36 (6): 325-328.
  4. Cannada LK, Jones TR, Guerrero-Bejarano M, et al. Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Diaphyseal Fractures Caused by Low-velocity Gunshots. Orthopaedics 2009; 32 (3): 162.
  5. Shahcheraghi GH, Doroodchi HR. Supracondylar fracture of the femur: closed or open reduction? J Trauma. Apr 1993; 34 (4): 499-502.
  6. Crist BD, Della Rocca GJ, Murtha YM. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures. Orthopedics. Jul 2008; 31 (7): 681-90.
  7. Johnson EE. Combined direct and indirect reduction of comminuted four-part intra articular T-type fractures of the distal femur. ClinOrthop. Jun 1988; (231): 154-62.
  8. Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing of Supracondylar Femoral Fractures.Clinical Orthopaedics& Related Research. May 1998; (350): 80-84.
  9. Placide RJ, Lonner JH. Fractures of the distal femur.Current Opinion in Orthopedics. February 1999; 10 (1): 2-9.
  10. Gao K, Gao W,Huang J, et al. Retrograde Nailing versus Locked Plating of Extra-Articular Distal Femoral Fractures: Comparison of 36 Cases. Med PrincPract 2013; 22: 161?166
  11. Thomson AB, Driver R, Kregor PJ, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after intra-articular distal femur fractures: ORIF versus retrograde intramedullary nailing. Orthopedics 2008; 3: 748?750.
  12. Bostman OM. Refracture after removal of a condylar plate from the distal third of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 2: 1013?1018.
  13. El-Kawy S, Ansara S, Moftah A. Retrograde femoral nailing in elderly patients with supracondylar fracture femur; is it the answer for a clinical problem? IntOrthop. February 2007; 31 (1): 83?86.
  14. Zehntner MK, MarchesiDG, Burch H, et al. Alignment of supracondylar/intercondylar fractures of the femur after internal fixation by AO/ASIF technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1992; 6 (3): 318-26.
  15. Leung KS, Shen WY, So WS, et al. Interlocking intramedullary nailing for supracondylar and intercondylar fractures of the distal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1991; 73:332-340
  16. Grass, R., Biewener, A., Endres, T., Rammelt, S., Barthel, Zwipp, H.: Clinical results after DFN- osteosynthesis. Unfallchirurg, 105: 587?594, 2002.
  17. Schandelmaier, P., Stephan, C., Krettek, C., Tscherne, H.: DistaleFemurfrakturen. Unfallchirurg, 70:428?436, 2000.
  18. Sch?tz, M., Schafer, M., Bail, H., Wenda, K., Haas, and N.: New osteosynthesis techniques for the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Zbl. Chir. 130: 307?313, 2005.
  19. Njus GO. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical compari?son of trigenretrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.J Trauma. 2009; 66(2):443-9.
  20. Walcher F, Frank J, Marzi I. Retrograde nailing of distal femoral fracture ? clear and potential indications. European Journal of Trauma. 2000; (4): 155-168.
  21. Prayson M, Herbenick M, Siebuhr K, et al. An Alternative Direction for Proximal Locking in Retrograde Femoral Nails. Orthopedics August 2008; 31 (8): 757-60.
  22. Ostrum RF, Agarwal A, Lakatos R, et al. Prospective comparison of retrograde and ante grade femoral intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14 (7): 496-501.
  23. Moed BR, Watson JT, Cramer KE, et al. Unreamed retrograde intramedullary nailing of fractures of the femoral shaft. J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12 (5): 334-342.
  24. Ostrum RF, Di Cicco J, Lakatos R, et al. Retrograde intramedullary nailing of femoral diaphyseal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12 (7): 464-468.
  25. Riaz S. Retrograde Femoral Nailing: A Modified Technique for Unusual Femoral Shaft Fractures. Pak J Med Res 2006; 45: 1.
  26. Yuvarajan P, Kaul R, Maini L. Review of concepts in distal femoral fractures management. Pb Journal of Orthopaedics 2009; 11 (1): 44?48.
  27. Scheerlinck T, Krallis P, Descamps PY, Hardy D, DelinceP.The femoral supracondylar nail: preliminary experience.ActaOrthop Belg. 1998;64(4):385-92.
  28. Prasanna Anaberu, MadhanJeyaraman, KartavyaChaudhari, Ajay SS, Sabarish K, et al. Prospective Study on Functional Outcome of Retrograde Femoral Nailing in Distal Third Femoral Fractures.J ClinExpOrthop.2019; 65:2.
  29. SeifSawalha, Jasdeep Giddie, Martyn Parker. Retrograde nailing for distal femur fractures in the elderly. SICOT J. 2015; 1: 31. 5.
  30. Arun K. N, Akshay. S. Dudhanale, Bagadia Pravin, Nakul H.S., DhameliyaNiravkumar G. Surgical Management of Supracondylar Femoral Fractures Using Retrograde Nail. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS).2014; 13, (12):61-67.
  31. Papadokostakis, G., Papakostidis, C., Dimitriou, R., and Giannoudis, P. V.: The role and efficacy of retrograde nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systemic review of the literature. Injury, 36: 813?822, 2005.
  32. Armstrong, R., Milliren, A., and Schrantz, W., Zeliger, K.: Retrograde interlocked intramedullary nailing of supracondylar distal femur fractures in an average 76-year-old patient population. Orthopedics, 26: 627?629, 2003.
  33. Dunlop, D. G., Brenkel, I. J.: The supracondylar intramedullary nail in elderly patients with distal femoral fractures. Injury, 30: 475?484, 1999.
  34. Gynning, J. B., Hansen, and D.: Treatment of distal femoral fractures with intramedullary supracondylar nails in elderly patients. Injury, 30: 43?46, 1999.
  35. Janzig, M. J., Vaes, F., Vandamme, G., Stockman, B., Broos, O.: Treatment of distal femoral fractures in the elderly. Unfallchirurgie, 24: 55?59, 1998.
  36. Schmeiser, G., Vastmans, J., Potulski, M., Hofmann, G. O., B?hren, V.: Treatment of paraplegics with fractures in the area of the knee using a retrograde intramedullary GSH nail. Unfallchirurg, 105: 612?618, 2002.
  37. Lucas SE, Seligson D, Henry SL. Intramedullary supracondylar nailing of femoralfractures. A preliminary report of the GSH supracondylar nail.ClinOrthop.1993; 296:200-206.
  38. Scheerlinck T, Krallis P, Descamps PY, Hardy D, Delince P. The femoral supracondylar nail: preliminary experience. ActaOrthop Belg. 1998; 64(4):385-92.
  39. Gurkan V, Orhun H, Doganay M, et al. Retrograde intramedullary interlocking nailing in fractures of the distal femur. ActaOrthopTraumatolTurc. 2009; 43(3):199-205.
  40. Bei C, Wang R, Tang J, Li Q. Effect factors analysis ofknee function recovery after distal femoral fracture operation. ZhongguoXiu Fu Chong Jian Wai KeZaZhi. 2009; 23(9):1053-7.
  41. AkibMajed Khan, Quen Oat Tang, Dominic Spicer. The Epidemiology of Adult Distal Femoral Shaft Fractures in a Central London Major Trauma Centre Over Five Years. Open Orthop J. 2017; 11:1277-91.
  42. Elsoe R, Ceccotti AA, Larsen P. Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. IntOrthop. 2018; 42(1):191-196.

[Idris M. Ettajouri and Mabrouk S. Bohalfaya (2020); DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES TREATED WITH RETROGRADE FEMORAL NAIL Int. J. of Adv. Res. 8 (Feb). 951-958] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Mabrouk S. Bohalfaya
Faculty of Medicine Benghazi University - Benghazi . Hawari General Hospital , Orthopedic Department

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10530      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10530