Vol. 8 (02) pp. 803-813 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10512

AN INVITRO STUDY TO COMPARE THE PULL OUT BOND STRENGTH OF A FIBER POST SYSTEM WITH TWO DIFFERENT POST SPACE DIAMETERS LUTED WITH TWO COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE RESIN CEMENTS

, , , , and
  • MDS IIIrd Year Post Graduate, COORG Institute of Dental Sciences, Karnataka, India.
  • MDS, Prof & Chair, COORG Institute of Dental Science, Karnataka, India.
  • MDS, Reader, COORG Institute of Dental Science, Karnataka, India.
  • MDS, Prof & Hod, COORG Institute of Dental Science, Karnataka, India.
  • MDS, Senior Lecturer, COORG Institute of Dental Science, Karnataka, India.
32 Downloads 112 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Objective: To compare and evaluate the bond strength of a fiber post cemented to different post space diameters using two commercially available resin cement. Methodology: 60 freshly extracted maxillary central incisor teeth with similar dimensions were selected and sectioned horizontally from CEJ. Endodontic treatment was done on all specimens and divided into two groups Group 1 and 2 (n=30) based on the post space diameter (0.9mm and 1.1mm). Each group was subdivided into two 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B (n=15) according to the cement used. Following the post space preparations, the canals were rinsed and dried. The adhesive resin cement was applied and posts were seated to full depth and excess cement was removed. After 24 hours specimens underwent 10,000 thermal cycles and preserved in saline solution. Specimens were mounted into universal testing machine and tensile force at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/ min was applied to the posts until they debond from the root canals. Data was analyzed using ANOVA test, Independent t test and Tukey HSD test. Result: The result shows increased bond strength in snug fit than passive fit. ie; more bond strength was observed in Group 1A (mean =26.75 KgF) and Group 1B (mean =15.72 KgF) where post size and peeso reamer drill size were same. When comparing two cements RELYX shows more bond strength (1A=26.75, 2A=14.82) than PANAVIA cement (1B=15.72, 2B=10.51). Conclusion: A post with snug fit post space preparation shows better resistance to pull out test than over prepared post space preparation. Cement RELYX U-200 shows higher tensile bond strength than PANAVIA-F cement.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Emel Uzunoglu, Sevinc Aktemur Turker1, Zeliha Yilmaz.Influence Of Cement Type And Thickness On Poly Fiber Post Adhesion. J Conserv Dent.2014;17(3):255-60
  2. d'arcangelo c,?cinelli m,?de angelis f,?d'amario m. the?effect?of?resin cement?film?thickness?on the?pullout?strength?of a fiber-reinforced?post?system. j prosthet dent.?2007; 98(3):193-8
  1. Hagge Ms, Wong Rd, Lindemuth Js. Effect Of Dowel Space Preparation And Composite Cement Thickness On Retention Of A Prefabricated Dowel. J Prosthodont. 2002 ; 11(1):19-24
  2. Stockton Lw. Factors?Affecting?Retention?Of?Post?Systems: A?Literature Review J Prosthet Dent.1999; 81(4):380-5
  3. Macedo Vc,?Souza Na,?Faria E Silva Al,?Cotes C,?Da Silva C,?Martinelli M,?Kimpara Et.Pullout ?Bond? Strength ?Of ?Fiber?Posts?Luted?To?Different?Depths?And?Submitted?To?Artificial Aging. Oper Dent.2013; 38(4):E1-6
  4. Egilmez F,?Ergun G,?Cekic-Nagas I,?Vallittu Pk,?Lassila Lv. Influence?Of? Cement Thickness?On The?Bond?Strength?Of?Tooth-Colored ?Posts?To ?Root?Dentin ?After? Thermal Cycling. Acta Odontol Scand.2013; 71 (1):175-82
  5. Pereira Jr,?Lins Do Valle A,?Ghizoni Js,?Lorenzoni Fc,?Ramos Mb,?Dos Reis S? Mv. Push-Out?Bond?Strengths Of?Different ?Dental Cements?Used To?Cement?Glass?Fiber?Posts. J Prosthet Dent.2013; 110(2):134-40
  6. Aleisa K,?Al-Dwairi Zn,?Alghabban R,?Goodacre Cj. Effect?Of?Luting?Agents?On The?Tensile? Bond?Strength? Of?Glass ?Fiber?Posts: An In?Vitro?Study. J Prosthet Dent.2013; 110(3):216-2
  7. Webber Mb,?Michida Sm,?Marson Fc,?De Oliveira Gc,?Silva Cde O. Analysis Of?Bond ?Strength?By? Pull?Out?Test ?On?Fiber?Glass?Posts?Cemented?In?Different?Lengths. J Int Oral Health.2015; 7(4):7-12.
  8. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive Post-Endodontic Restorations With Fiber Posts: Push-Out Tests And Sem Observations. Dent Mater. 2002; 18:596-602
  9. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A Retrospective Study Of 236 Patients With Teeth Restored By Carbon Fiber- Reinforced Epoxy Resin Posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80:151-7.
  10. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical Evaluation Of Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Resin Posts And Casts Posts And Cores. Am J Dent. 2000; 13:15b-18b.
  11. Valandro Lf, Filho Od, Valera Mc, De Araujo Ma. The Effect Of Adhesive Systems
  12. On The Pullout Strength Of A Fiberglass-Reinforced Composite Post System In Bovine J Adhes Den.T 2005; 7:331-6.
  13. D?arcangelo C, D?amario M, Prosperi Gd, Cinelli M, Giannoni M, Caputi S. Effect Of Surface Treatments On Tensile Bond Strength And On Morphology Of Quartz-Fiber Posts. J Endod. 2007; 33:264-7.
  14. Othman Hi, Elshinawy Mi, Abdelaziz Km. Retention Of Fiber Posts To The Optimally And Over-Prepared Dowel Spaces. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 ; 5(1):16-20
  15. Yu Tian, Yunjing Mu, Frank C. Setzer, Hong Lu, Tiejun Qu. Failure Of Fiber Posts After Cementation With Different Adhesives With Or Without Silanization Investigated
  16. By Pullout Tests And Scanning Electron Microscopy. J Endod.2012 Sep;38(9):1279-82
  17. Toman M, Toksavul S, Sarikanat M, Firidinoğlu K, Akin A. The Evaluation Of Displacement Resistance Of Glass Frc Posts To Root Dentine Using A Thin Slice Push-Out Test. Int Endod J. 2009; 42:802-10.

How to Cite This Article

Merin Thomas, Rupesh P.L, Mallikarjuna D.M, Basavaraj S. Salagundi, Unni Pympallil and Junu Henry (2020); AN INVITRO STUDY TO COMPARE THE PULL OUT BOND STRENGTH OF A FIBER POST SYSTEM WITH TWO DIFFERENT POST SPACE DIAMETERS LUTED WITH TWO COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE RESIN CEMENTS, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 8 (02), 803-813, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10512

Corresponding Author

DR. MERIN THOMAS
POST GRADUATE, COORG INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCE, KARNATAKA, INDIA
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.