TEACHER PARTICIPATION IN COLLABORATIVE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNERS ACHIEVEMENT IN KENYA

  • Kenyatta University Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Teacher Professional Development is a key component of educational reforms across the world with a view to improve teacher effectiveness and learner outcomes. Focus is shifting to collaborative teacher activities to improve learner outcomes. However, the effect of teacher participation in collaborative activities needs to be investigated due to persistent low learner outcomes in Kenya. The study adopted convergent parallel mixed methods approach design. A sample of 194 teachers in 68 public and private primary schools was selected using stratified random and purposive sampling. Twenty head teachers were purposively sampled. Data collection instruments were questionnaires, focus group discussion guide and semi structured interview guide. Data were analyzed using descriptiveand inferential statistics. The study established that teachers engaged in collaborative activities like sharing knowledge, peer coaching, lesson observation and team teaching. However, activities were top down lacking collegial approach. Teacher assistance in integrating technology was minimal due to inadequate ICT infrastructure, lack of skills among teachers and constraints in the time schedule. The study recommendedstakeholders supportfor variety ofcontinuous collaborativeprofessional development activities,improvement of ICT infrastructure and teacher capacitybuilding for improvedlearning outcomes in this digital era.


  1. Desimone, L. M. (2009). ?Improving Impact Studies of Teachers Professional Development: toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.? Educational Researcher 38 (3):181?199.
  2. Hochberg, E. D., &Desimone, L. M. (2010). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards.?Educational psychologist,?45(2), 89-106.
  3. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change, 4th edition, 35. New York City, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
  4. Teaching and Learning International Survey. (2008). Creating effective teaching and learning Environment first results from TALIS. Retrieved from https:// www.oecd.org/edu/school/43023606.pdf
  5. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81?112.
  6. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Evans, D., & Firth, A. (2005). The impact of collaborative CPDon classroom teaching and learning. Review: What do teacher impact data tell usabout collaborative CPD? London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London6
  7. Saxe, G. B., & Gearhart, M. (2001). Enhancing students' understanding of mathematics: A study of three contrasting approaches to professional support.?Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,?4(1), 55-79.
  8. Wayne, A. J., Garet, M. S., Brown, S., Rickles, J., Song, M., Manzeske, D., (2016). Early Implementation Findings from a Study of Teacher and Principal Performance Measurement and Feedback: Year 1 Report (NCEE 2017-4004). Retrieved from National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/ pubs/20174004/pdf/20174004.pdf
  9. OSullivan P. S. (2011) Reframing Research on Faculty Development, Acad Med, 2011 April. 86(4): 421-8: doi:10.1097/ACM.ob013e31820c058
  10. Global Education Monitoring Report Team (2014). Teaching and learning: achieving quality for all; EFA global monitoring report, 2013-2014; summary. Programme & meeting document
  11. Ma, L. (2010). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  12. Mawhinney, L. (2010). Lets lunch and learn: Professional knowledge sharing in teachers lounges and othercongregational spaces. Teaching and Teacher Education 26, 972-978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.039
  13. Little, J.W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M. and Kafka, J. (2003). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teachercommunity and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(5), 184-192.
  14. Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., &Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness.?education policy analysis archives,?13, 42.
  15. Feiman-Nemser, Sharon (2001) From Preparation to Practice: Designing a Continuum to Strengthen and Sustain Teaching. Teachers College Record, v103 n6 p1013-55 Dec 2001
  16. Marshall, J. L. (2005). Learning about teaching in communities:? Lessons for faculty development. Teaching Theology and Religion 8(1), 29-34
  17. Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilized concept.?Teaching and Teacher Education,?26(2), 306-314.
  18. Joyce, B. & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through professional development. In B. Joyce & B. Showers (Eds.), Designing training and peer coaching: Our need for learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD
  19. Hagen, A., and T. Nyen. 2009. Competence development for teachers. In [In Education 2009 leaning outcome and competence], 149?65. Oslo/ Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway
  20. Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers' collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning.?Teaching and Teacher Education,?26(3), 389-398.
  21. Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. (2009). Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning.?Teaching and teacher education,?25(1), 89-100.
  22. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. M., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and studentlearningto improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher?Education, 19, 643-658.
  23. Darling-Hammond, L. and McLaughlin, M.W (2011). Policies that support professional development in an Era of Reform. Phi DeltaKappa VL 92 2011/03/1 DOI: 10.1177/003172171109200622
  24. S?lvberg A. M., &Rismark, M., (2011) Knowledge Sharing in Schools: A Key to Developing Professional Learning Communities.World Journal of Education Vol. 1, No. 2; October 2011150 ISSN 1925-0746 E-ISSN 1925-0754
  25. Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., &Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness.?education policy analysis archives,?13, 42
  26. Little, J.W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M. and Kafka, J. (2003). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teachercommunity and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(5), 184-192.
  27. Ampofo S (2017) Effect of school heads instructional supervision practices on teacher role performance in selected public senior high schools, central region, Ghana; unpublished PhD thesis, Kenyatta University
  28. Tesfaw, T.A. &Hofman, R, H. (2014). Instructional supervision and its relationship with professional development: Perception of private and government secondary school teachers in Addis Ababa. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED534226
  29. Green, T. (2004). Literature review for school based staff developers and coaches. National Staff Development Council (NSDC}. Retrieved from http://www.nsdc.org/library/schoolbasdlitreview.pdf
  30. Murray S, Xin Ma,&Mazur M.,(2009).Effects of Peer Coaching on Teachers' Collaborative Interactions and Students' Mathematics AchievementThe Journal of Educational Research102(3):203-212???January 2009  DOI:?10.3200/JOER.102.3.203-212
  31. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2018). Education Quality Dialogues. State department of Basic Education, Nairobi: MOEST
  32. OECD (2005), Teachers Matter, OECD, Paris.
  33. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, (2016). National Assessment System for Monitoring Learner Achievement (NASMLA) at class 3. Nairobi: MOEST
  34. Piper, B., and Mugenda A (2012) The primary Math and Reading(PRIMR) Initiative: baselinreport. Prepared under the USAID education Data for Decision Making (EdData II) project, Task Order No.AID-623-M-1100001(RTI Task 13). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International, NC, USA.
  35. Whitehurst G. J., Chingos, M. M., & Lindquist, K. M. (2014). Evaluating teachers with classroom observations?lessons learned in four districts. Retrieved from Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Evaluating-Teachers-with- Classroom-Observations.pdf
  36. Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, S. Bolhuis, & Bergen C. M., (2008). ?Teacher Learning Through Reciprocal Peer Coaching: An Analysis of Activity Sequences.? Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (4): 982?1002. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.003.
  37. Dynarski, M. (2016, December 8). ?Teacher observations have been a waste of time and money.? Retrieved fromhttps://www.brookings.edu/research/teacher-observations-have-been-a-waste-of-time-and-money/
  38. Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. (2009). Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning.?Teaching and teacher education,?25(1), 89-100
  39. CEMASTEA (2016). A report of Secondary School Based INSET Through Lesson Study 2016.Unpublished Report. CEMASTEA: Nairobi: Kenya
  40. Madhuri H &Meghna S (2016) the effect of team teaching on academic achievement of 9th graders in science, scholarly research journal for interdisciplinary studies
  41. Nkechi PM, Akudolu, L R, Ezenwosu N E (2015) Effects of Team Teaching on Students Academic Achievement in English Language Comprehension Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) Volume 5, Issue 5 Ver. III (Sep. - Oct. 2015), PP 06-12
  42. Wadkins, T., Miller, R. L., & Wozniak, W. (2006). Team teaching: Student satisfaction and performance.?Teaching of Psychology,?22(2), 118-20.

[Damaris Kariuki and Florence Itegi (2020); TEACHER PARTICIPATION IN COLLABORATIVE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNERS ACHIEVEMENT IN KENYA Int. J. of Adv. Res. 8 (Mar). 977-988] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Damaris Kariuki
Department of Educational Management, Policy & Curriculum Studies, School of Education, Kenyatta University P O Box 43844, Nairobi, Kenya

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/10715      
DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/10715