23Sep 2021

THE RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL PROBABILITY SCORE IN (WELLS SCORE) THE DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM (PE) IN COVID-19 PATIENTS

  • Medical Resident Year Three King Faisel Hospital Taif. KSA.
  • Radiology Consultant King Faisel Hospital Taif. KSA.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Background: The risk of developing pulmonary embolism (PE) is high in patients infected with COVID-19, and its diagnosis is a severe challenge for healthcare professionals duringthe COVID-19 pandemic. Physicians are frequently usingcomputed tomography pulmonary angiography(CTPA), d-dimer, and well score for the diagnosis of PE.

Methods: A retrospective study was used in which we investigated the reliability of clinical well scores by collecting data, such as medical records in registered form (serum D-dimer level and Wells scores) of every patient for whom physicians have requested whose CTPA with suspicion of PE at King Faisal Medical Center (KFMC) from the period from 1st of April to the 1st of October.

Results: The study results showed significantly higher values of d-dimer in patients with positive PEcompared to those with negative values. In addition wells score is not a reliable preclinical score in diagnosis PE in COVID 19 patient.

Conclusions: As per the results of the well score, there is no significant difference between vulnerable people with PE +ve and -ve.  


[Saleh Alkhubaizi, Ahmad Al. ALalwi, Mamdoh Mahboob and Mohammed Al. Thubity (2021); THE RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL PROBABILITY SCORE IN (WELLS SCORE) THE DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM (PE) IN COVID-19 PATIENTS Int. J. of Adv. Res. 9 (Sep). 345-349] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr.saleh Alkhubaizi

Saudi Arabia

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/13417      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/13417