COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SUPRA GLOTTI CAIR WAY DEVICE SI-GEL AND LMA-SUPREME IN SHORT LAPROSCOPIC SURGERIES UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA

Aims And Objectives: In short laproscopic surgeries , 2nd generation supraglottic airway devices are recommended as good and safe alternative to intubation .We compared I gel and LMA supreme in short laproscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia with respect to ease and time for insertion ,the number of attempts, seal pressure under general anaesthesia Secondary- To compare hemodynamic changes and post of complications like sore throat ,blood staining of device ,bronchospasm , laryngospasm .

Materials And Method Study Design: Randomized , prospective, single blind, comparative interventional study METHODS- Eighty patients between 18-60 years of age of either sex, BMI < 30, ASA- I and ASA- II undergoing short laproscopic surgeries of less than one hour duration under general anaesthesia were included in this study after approval of institutional ethical committee. They were randomly allocated to I gel [ n=30] and supreme [n= 30] group .They were compared with respect to primary and secondary objectives ANALYSIS PLAN- Collected data were analysed using statistical package IBM SPSS version 16.

Result: Both groups were comparable with respect to demographic data , number of attempts, incidence of complications and hemodynamic response. Insertion of LMA supreme was significantly easy than I gel[ p =0.038]

Conclusion: LMA-Supreme is safe and effective device which is easier to insert than I-GEL and causes less airway trauma.