Vol. 12 (01) pp. 372-377 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/18131

COMPARATIVE STUDY: LICHTENSTEINS TENSION-FREE MESH REPAIR VS. STOPPAS REPAIR FOR BILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIAS

  • MS (General Surgery), Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka.
  • MS (General Surgery), Professor, Department of General Surgery, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka.
12 Downloads 107 Views
Crossref

Abstract

Our study investigates the viability of Giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac (GPRVS) Stoppas repair as an alternative to Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Repair for Bilateral Inguinal Hernias. With a focus on patient satisfaction and outcomes, the research aims to compare the two techniques based on postoperative complications, chronic groin pain, and postoperative pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS). In a sample of 70 cases, randomized into two groups, the study employs a single-incision bilateral approach. Results indicate that Stoppas repair offers comparable effectiveness to Lichtenstein, demonstrating a reduction in postoperative complications, chronic groin pain, and postoperative pain. The study concludes that GPRVS Stoppas repair is a promising alternative, emphasizing enhanced patient satisfaction and similar procedural success concerning Early Recurrence and Duration of Hospital Stay.

Keywords

How to Cite This Article

Koli Nikhil Vanura and Arun Kumar T. (2024); COMPARATIVE STUDY: LICHTENSTEINS TENSION-FREE MESH REPAIR VS. STOPPAS REPAIR FOR BILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIAS, International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 12 (01), 372-377, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/18131

Corresponding Author

Koli Nikhil Vanura

Article Analytics