- Abstract
- Keywords
- Cite This Article as
- Corresponding Author
This Paper compares how Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B. R. Ambedkar built rival yet complementary visions to constitute modern India. Both visionaries shared a vision of an independent, equitable nation, but fundamentally differed on means and priorities. Gandhis thought synthesised non-violence (ahimsa), religious values, and rural self-reliance, represented by khadi, village panchayats, and the pursuit of Swaraj as a moral renaissance. Ambedkars thought emphasised constitutionalism, rational critique of Brahmanical patriarchy, and social justice through legal reforms most notably, abolition of caste, affirmative action, and an independent judiciary enshrined in Indias Constitution. Through comparative reading of primary sources Hind Swaraj, Satyagraha texts, Annihilation of Caste, Drafting Committee debates and secondary literature in history, political science, and sociology, the essay analyses their contrasting positions on caste hierarchy, religious identity, economic models, educational paradigms, and political institutions. It traces critical junctures such as the Poona Pact and analyses how their ethical and institutional frameworks continue to inform modern debates on democracy, development, and social equity. The research argues that the interplay of Gandhian moral appeal and Ambedkarite structural guarantees offers a rich map to navigate India's enduring challenges.
[Nimai Sarkar (2025); THE MAKING OF MODERN INDIA: IDEOLOGICAL STRUGGLES OF GANDHI AND AMBEDKAR Int. J. of Adv. Res. (Jun). 969-974] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com
PhD Research Scholar, Department of Philosophy Tripura University (A Central University) Suryamani Nagar, Agartala, Tripura, India – 799022
India
