SEKOLAH TINGGI TEOLOGI GLOBAL GLOW INDONESIA

This research and article explore the comparative impact of meritocracy and theocracy on communication dynamics within a social system. Meritocracy, as a system that prioritizes individual achievement and ability, is assumed to promote egalitarian and transparent information flow, facilitating horizontal and participatory communication based on rational argumentation and empirical data. Conversely, theocracy, which places religious authority as the primary foundation, tends to form hierarchical communication structures, where information flows vertically from the pinnacle of religious authority, with an emphasis on obedience and dogma. This study will analyze how these two systems shape perceptions of truth, narrative authority, and public participation in the communication process. Through a critical communication approach, this article highlights the potential for information distortion, rhetorical manipulation, and restrictions on freedom of expression in both systems, albeit through different mechanisms. This paper also evaluates the conditions of professional placement based on obedience to God rather than superiors within church organizations and theological education institutions. The primary objective is to understand the communication implications of these systemic choices on social cohesion, collective decision-making, and the development of public discourse. Thus, this article contributes to a richer understanding of how power structures influence how society sends, receives, and interprets messages, thereby improving the quality and quantity of personnel within organizations.