Detailed Peer Review History of the Manuscript

Title: EVALUATION OF COCOS NUCIFERA (COCONUT) STARCH AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO SERUM SEPARATOR TUBES FOR ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE AND FASTING BLOOD SUGAR

Peer Reviewers:

  • Reviewer First: Dr. Suman Kalyan Nath

  1. Stage 1: Initial Manuscript Submission

  2. Stage 2: Peer Review Reports

    • Reviewer 1: Dr. Suman Kalyan Nath
      • Reviewer Report File: Reviewer 1 Report
      • Average Peer Review Marks at Initial Stage: 10/10

        (Initial evaluation is based on scientific contribution, novelty, clarity, and methodology.)

      • Comments: TEXT

  3. Stage 3: Author Revisions

    Comments:The authors have carefully addressed all the feedback provided by the reviewers, ensuring that necessary changes have been made to enhance the manuscript's quality. These revisions include improvements to the methodology, clarity, scientific rigor, and overall presentation of the manuscript. All suggestions and concerns raised by the reviewers have been thoroughly considered and incorporated. The updated manuscript now reflects these changes, ensuring that it meets the required standards for publication. The authors believe that these revisions have significantly improved the paper and have strengthened its contribution to the field.

  4. Stage 4: Final Review by Editor

    • Editor's Comments: The final assessment confirms that the manuscript meets the journal's publication standards. Any necessary refinements have been addressed, ensuring the manuscript is ready for publication without further modifications.
    • Average Peer Review Marks at Publication Stage: 6/10

      Post-revision, the manuscript typically improves in clarity and scientific rigor.

  5. Stage 5: Publication Stage

Journal: International Journal of Advanced Research
Publisher: Jana Publication and Research LLP
Contact Us: journalijar@gmail.com