02Oct 2018

THE EFFECT OF SELF-EFFICACY AND OBEDIENCE PRESSURE ON AUDIT JUDGMENT BY USING TASK COMPLEXITY AND MORAL REASONING AS THE MODERATING VARIABLE.

  • Magister of Accounting, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
  • Economics and Business Faculty, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Ensuring that the implementation of good governance activities was necessary for functional supervision in the government that can be carried out by internal and external auditors. This study aims to provide a review of the determinant factors in influencing the audit judgment of the government\'s external auditor. As many as 58 auditors from the State Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia Representative of Southeast Sulawesi Province were sampled in this study. Data collection using a questionnaire instrument. And data were analyzed using Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results of this study showed that (1) self-efficacy has a significant effect on audit judgment, (2) the obedience pressure has a significant effect on audit judgment, (3) the task complexity moderates the relationship of self-efficacy on audit judgment, positive-signed regression coefficients that indicate that the task complexity strengthens the relationship of self-efficacy on audit judgment, (4) the task complexity moderates the relationship of obedience pressure on audit judgment. Positive-signed regression coefficients that indicate that the task complexity strengthens the relationship of obedience pressure on audit judgment, (5) Moral reasoning does not moderate the relationship of self-efficacy to audit judgment, and (6) Moral reasoning moderates the relationship of obedience pressure on audit judgment. The regression coefficient is negative, indicating that the existence of moral reasoning weakens the relationship of obedience pressure on audit judgment. Originality for this paper shows as: conduct a research about task complexity and moral reasoning of auditor external in governmental sector in producing the audit judgment especially in Southeast Sulawesi Province in Indonesia, and this research retest the research result from Jackman and Oldham (1980), Cohen et al. (2001), Jamilah et al. (2007), Iskandar and Sanusi (2011); Yuliani (2012); Sanusi et al. (2015); and Nursaid (2016). Based on these, researcher use model combination and quantitative approach.


  1. Abdolmohammadi, M. dan Wright, A. 1987. An Examination of The Effect of Experience and Tax Complexity on Audit Judgment. The Accounting Review, 62 (1), pp 1-13.
  2. Ajzen, Icek. 1985. from intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl& J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control:From cognition to behavior (pp. 1 l-39). Heidelberg: Springer.
  3. Ajzen, Icek. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol. 50, pp. 179-211.
  4. 2014. The Effect of Performance Incentive on Audit Judgment By Using The Effort as The Intervening Variable and The Task Complexity as The Moderating Variable. IJABER, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp: 1305-1314.
  5. Bandura, A. 1977. Sosial Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
  6. Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  7. Bandura, A. 1993. Perceived Self-efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
  8. Bell, B. S. and Kozlowski, S. W. 2002. Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on selfefficacy, performance, and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87 No. 3, pp. 497?505.
  9. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. and Kilcullen, R. N. 2000. Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85 No. 6, pp. 835?847
  10. Cohen, Jeffrey R., Lisa Milici Gaynor, Ganesh Krishnamoorthy, and Arnold M. Wright. 2011. The Impact on Auditor Judgments of CEO Influence on Audit Committee Independence. Auditing: A Journal Of Practice dan Theory, 30 (4):89-100.
  11. Cohen, J. D; Greene, J. D, Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., &. Darley, J. M. 2001. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105?2108.
  12. Daljono, Seni Fitriani. 2012. Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Kompleksitas Tugas, Pengetahuan, dan Persepsi Etis Terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Akuntansi, Vol 1, No. 1.
  13. Drupadi, Made Julia dan Sudana, I Putu. 2015. Pengaruh Keahlian Auditor, Tekanan Ketaatan dan Independesi pada Audit Judgment. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, Vol. 12 No. 3. ISSN: 2302-8556. Hal 623-655.
  14. Fleishman, E. A. 1975. Toward a taxonomy of human performance. American Psychologist, 30,1127-1149.
  15. Gaffikin, Michael and ASL Lindawati. 2012. The Moral Reasoning of Public Accountants in the Development of a Code of Ethics: the Case of Indonesia. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, volume 6: 3 ? 28.
  16. Hafid, Andi Qadriah. 2016. Pengaruh pengalaman, tekanan ketaatan, dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit Judgment APIP dengan etika auditor sebagai variable Tesis. Universitas Hasanuddin. Makassar.
  17. Haron, Hasnah, Ishak Ismail dan Aw Lo Na. 2015. The Effect of Moral Reasoning Exposure to Ethics and Perceived Ethical Climate on Ethical Judgment of Auditors in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, Vol 8 (2).
  18. R. M., dan H.J. Einhorn. 1992. Order Effects in Belief Updating: The Belief-Adjustment Mode. Cognitive Psychology 24: 1?55.
  19. Iskandar, Takiah Mohd, dan Sanusi, Mohd Zuaraidah. 2011. Assesing The Effect Of Self-Efficacy And Taks Complexity On Internal Control Audit Judgment. AAMJAF, 7, No. 1 pp: 29-52.
  20. Jamilah, S., Fanani, Z., dan Chandrarin, G. 2007. Pengaruh gender, tekanan ketaatan dan komplesitas tugas terhadap Audit Judgment. Symposium nasional akuntansi X, pp26-28.
  21. Januarti, Indira dan Faisal. 2010. Pengaruh Moral Reasoning Dan Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Pemerintah Terhadap Kualitas Audit Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII. Purwokerto.
  22. Jenkins, J. Gregory and C. M. Haynes. 2003. The Persuasiveness of Client Preferences: An Investigation of the Impact of Preference Timing and Client Credibility. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol.22. No.1, March: 143 ? 154.
  23. Kohlberg, L. 1982. Essays on moral develop ent, Vol I: The philosophy of moral development. Harper & Row, San Francisco.
  24. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M. and Nason, E. R. 2001. Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 85 No. 1, pp. 1?31.
  25. Kusumawati, Andi, and Syamsuddin. 2018. The Effect of Auditor Quality to Professional Skepticsm and Its Relationship to Audit Quality. International Journal of Law and Management. Emerald Insight.
  26. Kusumawati, Andi, Syamsuddin and Sri Sundari. 2017. External Auditor Professional Skeptics In Producing Audit Quality. International Journal of Economic Research, 14 Number 2.
  27. Libby, R. and Luft, J. 1995. Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings:ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations andSociety, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 425-50.
  28. Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C, & Bobko, P. 1984. The effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241-251.
  29. Lord, Alan T. dan F. Todd Dezoort. 2001. The Impact of Commitment and Moral Reasoning on Auditors? Responses to Social Influence Pressure. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26, pp 215-235.
  30. Margaret, Agnes Noviriana dan Surya Raharja. 2014. Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgment pada Auditor BPK RI. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3 No. 2, pp. 1-13.
  31. Mindarti, Ceacilia Sri, Pancawati Hardiningsih, dan Rachmawati Meita Oktaviani. 2016. Moral Reasoning Memoderasi Kompetensi dan Independensi Terhadap Audit.Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX, Lampung.
  32. Nadhiro, Siti Asih. 2010. Pengaruh Kompleksitas Tugas, Orientasi Tujuan dan Self- Efficacy terhadap Kinerja Auditor dalam Pembuatan Audit Judgment (Studi Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Semarang). UNDIP: Semarang.
  33. Peterson, N. G., & Bownas, D. A. 1982. Skill, task structure and performance acquisition. In M. D. Dunnette & E. A. Fleishman (Eds.). Human performance and productivity (Vol. l,pp. 49-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  34. Phillips, J. M. and Gully, S. M. 1997. Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal setting process. Journal of AppliedPsychology, Vol. 82 No. 5, pp. 792?802.
  35. Praditaningrum, Anugrah Suci. 2012. Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Audit Judgment (Studi pada BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Tengah). Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
  36. Rasmussen, Bent Warming dan Carolyn A. Windsor. Danish Evidence of Auditors? Level of Moral Reasoning and Predisposition to Provide Fair Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics 47: 77?87.
  37. Sanusi, Mohd Zuaraidah; Iskandar, Takiah Mohd dan Saleh, Norman Mohd. 2015. Effects Of Goal Orientation, Self-Efficacy And Task Complexity On The Audit Judgment Performance Of Malaysian Auditors. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Emerald Insight.
  38. Sekaran, Uma and Roger Bougie. 2016. Research Methods for Business. Seventh Edition. United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons.
  39. Suardihka, I Made Sadha dan Ketut Budiartha. 2017. Kemampuan Gender MemoderasiPengaruh Self-efficacy danKompleksitasTugaspada Audit Judgment. Jurnal, 12, No. 3, ISSN 1978-6069.
  40. Susetyo, Budi. 2009. Pengaruh Pengalaman Audit Terhadap Pertimbangan Auditor dengan Kredibilitas Klien Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Online (Tesis). Universitas Diponegoro.
  41. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. 1998a. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240?261.
  42. Sulila, Ismet. 2008. Audit Kinerja Sektor Publik. Jurnal Inovasi, Vol.5, No. 2.
  43. 2015. Pengaruh Self-efficacy, Kecerdasan Emosional, Tekanan Ketaatan dan Kompleksitas Tugas terhadap Auditor Judgment Auditor (Studi Empiris pada KAP di Pekanbaru, Padang, dan Batam). Jom FEKON , Vol 2 No. 1.
  44. Tatiwekeng, Cindy Westefina. 2013. PengaruhEfikasiDiri, KompleksitasTugas, dan Audit JudgmentterhadapKualitas AuditJudgmentAuditor Internal Pemerintah. Jurnal Online (tesis). Yogyakarta.
  45. Triavenant, Marsha. 2014. Pengaruh Gender, Orientasi Tujuan, Self-efficacy, dan Pengalaman terhadap Audit Judgment (Survei pada 11 Kantor Akuntansi Publik di Jakarta). Bandung: Universitas Widyatama.
  46. Throne, Linda dan Jon Hartwick. 2001. The Directional Effects of Discussion on Auditors? Moral Reasoning.Contemporary Accounting Research 18 No. 2 pp. 337?61.
  47. Wood, R.E. 1986. Task Complexity, Definition of The Construct. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Prosess, pp: 60-82.
  48. Yendrawati, Reni dan Mukti, Dheane Kurnia. 2015. Pengaruh Gender, Pengalaman Auditor, Kompleksitas Tugas, Tekanan Ketaatan, Kemampuan Kerja dan Pengetahuan Auditor terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Inovasi dan Kewirausahaan, 4 No. 1, hal: 1-8.
  49. Yuliani, Nur Laila. 2012. Tekanan Ketaatan, Kompleksitas Tugas, Independensi, Pengetahuan, dan Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Akuntansi, 5 (3), hal 40-53.
  50. Yusrianthe, Rahmawati Hanny. 2012. Kajian Empiris Audit Judgment pada Auditor. Media Riset Akuntansi, 2. No. 2, hal. 170-186.
  51. 2007. Pengaruh Interaksi Gender, Kompleksitas Tugas dan Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Audit Judgment (Sebuah Kajian Eksperimental Dalam Audit Saldo Akun Persediaan). Simposium Nasional IX.

[Hasnidar , Mediaty and Andi Kusumawati. (2018); THE EFFECT OF SELF-EFFICACY AND OBEDIENCE PRESSURE ON AUDIT JUDGMENT BY USING TASK COMPLEXITY AND MORAL REASONING AS THE MODERATING VARIABLE. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 6 (10). 238-248] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Hasnidar
Hasanuddin University

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7805       DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7805


Share this article