Vol. 5 (02) pp. 2627-2640 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/3467

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW STUDYING THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS ON THE RETENTION OF IMPLANT TELESCOPIC OVERDENTURES.

and
43 Downloads 174 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate and compare between implant-supported telescopic retained overdentures reinforced by framework made of different materials in terms of retention. Search was made in 3 databases including PubMed, Ebscohost and Google scholar, title and abstract were screened to select studies related to telescopic overdenture and measuring its retention. Articles which did not follow the inclusion criteria were excluded. Included papers were then read carefully for a second stage filter, this was followed by manual searching of bibliography of selected articles. The search resulted in 15 included papers. These studies aimed to study the impact of the manufacturing technique and the recently introduced variable materials of the telescopic crowns on the retentive forces.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. LaBarre E, Giusti L and Pitigoi-Aron G, Addressing problems in complete dentures. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2007. 28: p. 538-542.
  2. Frisch E, Ziebolz D, Ratka KP and Rinke S, Double Crown Retained Maxillary Overdentures: 5 Year Follow Up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015. 17: p. 22-31.
  3. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA, Geertman ME and Van Oort RP, Implant?retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; a 5?years' follow?up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1999. 10: p. 238-244.
  4. Stock V, Schmidlin PR, Merk S, Wagner C, Roos M, Eichberger M and Stawarczyk B, PEEK Primary Crowns with Cobalt-Chromium, Zirconia and Galvanic Secondary Crowns with Different Tapers—A Comparison of Retention Forces. Materials J, 2016. 9: p. 187-188.
  5. Turp I, Bozda? E, Sünbülo?lu E, Kahruman C, Yusufo?lu ? and Bayraktar G, Retention and surface changes of zirconia primary crowns with secondary crowns of different materials. Clin Oral Investig, 2014. 18: p. 2023-2035.
  6. Grossmann AC, Hassel AJ, Schilling O, Lehmann F, Koob A and Rammelsberg P, Treatment with double crown-retained removable partial dentures and oral health-related quality of life in middle- and high-aged patients. Int J Prosthodont, 2007. 20(6): p. 576-8.
  7. Uludag B, Sahin V and Ozturk O, Fabrication of zirconium primary copings to provide retention for a mandibular telescopic overdenture: a clinical report. Int J Prosthodont, 2008. 21: p. 509-510.
  8. Besimo CH, Graber G and Fluhler M, Retention force changes in implant-supported titanium telescope crowns over long-term use in vitro. J Oral Rehabil, 1996. 23: p. 372-378.
  9. Bayer S, Stark H, Golz L, Keilig L, Kraus D, Hansen A and Enkling N, Telescopic crowns: extra-oral and intra-oral retention force measurement--in vitro/in vivo correlation. Gerodontology, 2012. 29: p. 340-347.
  10. Singh K and Gupta N, Telescopic denture—a treatment modality for minimizing the conventional removable complete denture problems: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res, 2012. 6: p. 1112-1116.
  11. Kwon HB, Roh YH and Lee SH, The comparison of initial retentive force in different double crown systems. J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 2006. 44: p. 677-682.
  12. Yi YJ, Cho LR and Park CJ, Cause of technical failures of conical crown-retained denture (CCRD): a clinical report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 2003. 41: p. 714-719.
  13. Sakai Y, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N and Igarashi Y, Effects of surface roughness and tapered angle of cone crown telescopic system on retentive force. Dent Mater J, 2011. 30: p. 635-641.
  14. Mansour S, Setz JM and Boeckler ODAF, All-ceramic one-piece telescopic abutments for implant-supported overdentures. Int Poster J Dent Oral Med, 2016. 3: p. 540 - 554.
  15. Gurbulak AG, Kilic K, Ero?lu Z, Gercekcioglu E and Kesim B, Evaluation of the retention force of double conical crowns used in combination with a galvanoforming and casting fabrication technique. J Prosthodont, 2013. 22: p. 63-68.
  16. Gutierrez Riera JJF, Albano R.; Rivera, Francisco Zárate; Salinas, Thomas J., Alternative Designs in Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: The Telescopic Approach. Quint Dent Tech, 2006. 29: p. 127-129.
  17. Bayer S, Stark H, Mues S, Keilig L, Schrader A and Enkling N, Retention force measurement of telescopic crowns. Clin Oral Investig, 2010. 14: p. 607-11.
  18. Pietruski JK, Sajewicz E, Sudnik J and Pietruska MD, Retention force assessment in conical crowns in different material combinations. Acta of Bioeng and Biomech, 2013. 15: p. 35-42.
  19. Verma R, Joda T, Brägger U and Wittneben JG, A Systematic Review of the Clinical Performance of Tooth?Retained and Implant?Retained Double Crown Prostheses with a Follow?Up of? 3 Years. J Prosthodont, 2013. 22: p. 2-12.
 

How to Cite This Article

Mohamed Marwan Sadik Rahhal and Ahmed Emad Fayyad. (2017); A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW STUDYING THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS ON THE RETENTION OF IMPLANT TELESCOPIC OVERDENTURES. , Int. J. of Adv. Res., 5 (02), 2627-2640, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3467

Corresponding Author

Mohamed Marwan Sadik Rahhal
PhD, Lecturer, Implants & Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, MSA University.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.