Vol. 7 (04) pp. 165-177 DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/8803

RECONSTRUCTION OF SECURITY LAW ON FINANCING AGREEMENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF JUSTICE-BASED FIDUCIARY REGISTRATION.

, and
  • Doctorate Student of PDIH Faculty of Law Unissula.
13 Downloads 61 Views
Crossref

Download Full Paper (PDF)

Abstract

Along with the increasing economic development and increasing and increasing needs, the costs needed will be even greater, both for life needs and for businesses where the costs needed are mostly obtained from lending and borrowing activities. In these lending and borrowing activities, there are legal products used by the community in the form of guaranteeing goods to obtain financing. This is where fiduciary security is present to meet legal needs in guaranteeing lending and borrowing activities.The purpose of this study is to find out the application of fiduciary guarantee law No. 42 of 1999, The main objective of this study is to design an ideal legal reconstruction of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law No. 42 of 1999 so that law enforcement and legal compliance are being the ideal of this Act can be realized ideally and optimally. This study uses normative legal research which includes legal principles, legal systematics, legal synchronization, comparative law and legal history.There are 2 important findings in this study, First, there is uncertainty in sanctions in the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, so this makes the Law not have the power in the application of the law. Secondly, there is inconsistency and disharmony in the Fiduciary Guarantee Law and the Minister of Finance Regulation which are the implementing regulations, so that law enforcement from this law is not optimal as Normative Law and Fiduciary Law does not have forced efforts in terms of law enforcement for necessity in conducting fiduciary registration. Due to the weaknesses of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law No. 42 of 1999, researchers see that it is very necessary for an ideal Reconstruction of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law so that law enforcement and Legal Compliance can be realized with an ideal, Optimal and fulfilling sense of Justice.

Keywords

Article Analytics

References

  1. Anton M Muliono, KamusBesarBahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: BalaiPustaka, 1989.
  2. A.AndiPrayitno, ?HukumFidusiaProblematikaYuridisPemberlakuanUndang-undang No 42 Tahun 1999,? Untag Surabaya 2009.
  3. out BardaNawawieArief, ?KuliahPembaharuanHukumNasional,? UNDIP.
  4. N. Arif, ?RUU KUHP BaruSebuahRestruturisasi / RekonstruksiSistemHukumPidana Indonesia,? UNDIP, 2009.
  5. Widjya and A. Yani, JaminanFidusia. Jakarta: PT. Raja GrafindoPersada, 2003.
  6. Kelsen, TeoriHukumMurni, Dasar-dasarIlmuHukumNormatif, diterjemahkanolehRaisulmuttaqien. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2006.
  7. OK., ?KajianHukumEksistensiJaminanFidusiaPadaPerjanjian Finance Leasing MenurutUndang-Undang No.42 Tahun 1999,? FakultasHukumUniversitasMuhammadiyah Sumatera, 2009.
  8. ?LaporanPenelitianFidusia , Tim PenelitiHukumJaminanKerjasamaBidangHukumBelandadengan Indonesia,.? .
  9. Lawrence M Friedmani, ?The Legal System : A. Social Science Perspective.? Russel Sage Foundation, New York, 1986.
  10. Lawrence M. Friedman, The Legal System; A Social ScincePrespective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 1975.
  11. Muladi, PentingnyaLembagaJaminanFidusiaDalamMeningkatkan Pembangunan EkonomiNasional, Seminar Nasional ?ProblematikaDalamPelaksanaanJaminanFidusia Di Indonesia ; UpayaMenujuKepastianHukum. .
  12. Fuadi, JaminanFidusia. bandung: Citra Aditya, 2003.
  13. A. Susanto, ?DimensiAksiologis Dari PutusanKasus ?ST? KajianPutusanPeninjauanKembaliNomor 97 PK/Pid.Sus/2012,? J. Yudisial, vol. Vol. 7, no. No. 3.
  14. H. Tiong, Fidusiasebagaijaminanunsur-unsurperikatan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1985.
  15. Ratnawati W Prasojo, ?Pokok-pokokUndang-undangNomor 42 Tahun 1999, tentangJaminanFidusia,? majalahhukum Tri Sakti ,nomor 33 / tahun XXIV/Oktober 1999, 1999.
  16. Biersted, The Social Order. 1970.
  17. Sidharta, ReformasiPeradilandanTanggungJawab Negara, BungaRampaiKomisiYudisial, Putusan Hakim: AntaraKeadilan, KepastianHukum, danKemanfaatan,KomisiYudisialRepublik Indonesia. Jakarta, 2010.
  18. Soekanto, Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhipenegakanhukum. UI Press, 1983.
  19. R. Hartono, HukumEkonomi Indonesia. Malang: Banyumedia Indonesia Publishing, 2007.
  20. Suteki, ?Urgensi Sociological Jurisprudence DalamPencarianKeadilanSubstansial di era Globalisasi, Orasiilmiah,? Dies Nataliske 53 FakultasHukum UNDIP.
  21. Kamelo, HukumJaminanFidusiaSuatuKebutuhan Yang di Dambakan. bandung, 2006.
  22. Yusriadi, TebaranPemikiranKritisHukumdanMasyarakat. malang: Surya Penan Gemilang2009, 2009.
  23. ?Undang-undangJaminanFidusia No 42,? 1999.
  24. ?PeraturanPemerintahNomor 86,? 2000.
  25. KementerianPerindustrianRepublik Indonesia, PertumbuhanIndustriOtomotifDiprediksimelejit. .
  26. Susanto, ?Sepeda motor :perandantantangan.? [Online]. Available: http//www.aisi.or.id /fileadmin/user-upload/download/01.bambang Susanto .pdf ,diaksestanggal 26 jan 2018%0A.
  27. renateWiranjaya, PersainganKetatDua Raja, Pembiayaan.
  28. Budi, Ada PotensiKerugian Negara yang dilakukan Perusahaan Pembiayaan , http//www.ipotnews.com/m.article/php?OJK adapotensikerugiannegara yang dilakukanperusahaanpembiayaan.

How to Cite This Article

OK Isnainul, Gunarto and Darwinsyah Minn. (2019); RECONSTRUCTION OF SECURITY LAW ON FINANCING AGREEMENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF JUSTICE-BASED FIDUCIARY REGISTRATION., Int. J. of Adv. Res., 7 (04), 165-177, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8803

Corresponding Author

OK Isnainul
Doctorate Student of PDIH Faculty of Law Unissula
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.