COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF FIBRE REINFORCED COMPOSITE RESIN OVER CONVENTIONAL BAND AND LOOP FOR SPACE MAINTENANCE IN CHILDREN
Abstract
Aim:TocomparetheclinicalsuccessrateofFiberReinforcedCompositeResinspacemaintainerwiththatofConventionalBandandLoopspacemaintainerinchildrenofagegroup6-8years.
Methodology:Atotalof60subjects(31girlsand29boys)ofagegroup6to8yearsrequiringspacemaintenanceduetoprematurelossofprimarymolars.ChildrenwhoreceivedFibreReinforcedCompositeResinandBandandLoopspacemaintainerswerecategorizedasGroup1andGroup2respectively.Subjectswererecalledattheendof1st,3rd,and6thmonthsforevaluationofbothtypesofspacemaintainerswhenclinicalsuccessrateofbothtypesofspacemaintainerswereevaluated.Treatmentacceptabilityduringandaftertheprocedurewascheckedusingsix-pointWong-BakerFacesScale.
StatisticalAnalysis:ThestatisticalanalysiswasperformedbyusingastatisticalsoftwarepackageSPSSversion25statisticalsoftware.Quantitativevariableswereexpressedasmeanandstandarddeviation.Comparisonofquantitativevariablesbetweenthetwogroupswereanalyzedbyunpairedttest.Qualitativevariableswereexpressedasfrequencyandproportion.Comparisonofqualitativevariablesbetweentwogroupswereanalyzedbychi-squaretest.Apvaluelessthan0.05wasconsideredasstatisticallysignificant
Results:Thisstudycomparedthesuccessratesof60spaceMaintainersBandandloopandFRCRsin30childrenintheDepartmentofPediatricDentistryatGovernmentDentalCollege,Thiruvananthapuram.60spacemaintainerswereevaluatedattheendof6months,30bandandloopspacemaintainers wereevaluated,6failedand24weresuccessful.Outof30FRCRspacemaintainers,5failedand25wereconsideredsuccessful.Theclinicalsuccessratewasfoundtobe83.3%forFRCRand81.7%forbandandloop.Thedifferences,however,werenotstatisticallysignificant(P>.05).
Conclusion:Althoughstatisticallynosignificantdifferenceinsuccessratesbetweenthesetwotypesofspacemaintainers,FibreReinforcedCompositeResinspacemaintainerhadslightedgeoverBandandloopspacemaintainerintermsofclinicalefficiency.PatientacceptancetowardsthemwerealsofoundFRCRspacemaintainerswasfoundtobeslightlybetterthantothatofbandandloopspacemaintainers.OnasubjectiveopinionmanyofthesubjectspraisedtheestheticqualityofFRCR.TheevidenceobtainedsuggeststhatFRCRisasuitablealternativetoBandandLoopforshorttermspacemaintenanceinyoungchildren.
Keywords
Article Analytics
How to Cite This Article
Yadukrishnan M.S, Rita Zarina A., Digesh Balachandran and Danu Dayakar (2023); COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF FIBRE REINFORCED COMPOSITE RESIN OVER CONVENTIONAL BAND AND LOOP FOR SPACE MAINTENANCE IN CHILDREN, Int. J. of Adv. Res., 11 (09), 1170-1178, ISSN 2320-5407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/17631
Corresponding Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





